Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24149221›Full record

ArticleJournal of sports science & medicine2007

Longitudinal changes in the spinal kinematics of oarswomen during step testing.

Alison H McGregor, Zeenat S Patankar, Anthony M J Bull

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Rowing Injuries: An Updated Review.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2017
    Review
  5. Injury prevention, performance and return to sport: How can science help?Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2017
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alison H McGregorBiodynamics Group, Imperial College London, UK.
Zeenat S Patankar
Anthony M J Bull

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Earlier studies have investigated the biomechanics of rowing during step testing with a focus on lumbo-pelvic kinematics and force output and noted that these parameters change with work intensity. The aim of this study was to investigate how the biomechanics of the rowing stroke changes over time as a result of coaching and training and to see if these change were related to a change in physiological performance. An electromagnetic motion measuring device in conjunction with a load cell was used to determine the ergometer rowing kinematics of 7 elite international oarswomen during routine step tests over a two year period. Force output was observed to improve over the two year time period, with peak force significantly rising by 40-80 N. This was associated with significant increases in stroke length of between 15 and 19 cm. Both of these are indicative of improvement in performance. Kinematic variables were also observed to change, with greater pelvic rotation and associated lumbar spine motion at the later time point. The findings of this study demonstrate that rowing technique changes with time, and suggest that kinematics measures of rowing technique may be important tools to monitor athletes. Key pointsKinematics of rowing technique change with time and reflect improvements in performanceImproved kinematics appear to be associated with improved rowing efficiencyImprovement in stroke length linked in part to improvements in lumbo-pelvic technique.

Indexed as

lumbo-pelvic motion force outputperformanceStroke length

Identifiers

PMID24149221
PMCPMC3778696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.