ArticleJournal of sports science & medicine2007
Longitudinal changes in the spinal kinematics of oarswomen during step testing.
Article in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contribution of trunk swing to the performance of fixed-seat rowing.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- Assessment of Angular and Straight Linear Rowing Ergometers at Different Intensities of Exercise.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Kinematics of Cervical Spine during Rowing Ergometer at Different Stroke Rates in Young Rowers: A Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Rowing Injuries: An Updated Review.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2017Review
- Injury prevention, performance and return to sport: How can science help?Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2017Review
- Changes in rowing technique over a routine one hour low intensity high volume training session.Journal of sports science & medicine · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Earlier studies have investigated the biomechanics of rowing during step testing with a focus on lumbo-pelvic kinematics and force output and noted that these parameters change with work intensity. The aim of this study was to investigate how the biomechanics of the rowing stroke changes over time as a result of coaching and training and to see if these change were related to a change in physiological performance. An electromagnetic motion measuring device in conjunction with a load cell was used to determine the ergometer rowing kinematics of 7 elite international oarswomen during routine step tests over a two year period. Force output was observed to improve over the two year time period, with peak force significantly rising by 40-80 N. This was associated with significant increases in stroke length of between 15 and 19 cm. Both of these are indicative of improvement in performance. Kinematic variables were also observed to change, with greater pelvic rotation and associated lumbar spine motion at the later time point. The findings of this study demonstrate that rowing technique changes with time, and suggest that kinematics measures of rowing technique may be important tools to monitor athletes. Key pointsKinematics of rowing technique change with time and reflect improvements in performanceImproved kinematics appear to be associated with improved rowing efficiencyImprovement in stroke length linked in part to improvements in lumbo-pelvic technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24149221PMC3778696What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.