Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24149137›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2013

Impact of molecular alterations and targeted therapy in appendiceal adenocarcinomas.

Kanwal P S Raghav, Aditya V Shetty, Syed M A Kazmi, Nianxiang Zhang, Jeffrey Morris, Melissa Taggart, Keith Fournier, Richard Royal, Paul Mansfield, Cathy Eng and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neoplastic appendiceal mucinous lesions: a narrative review of the literature from an oncologist's perspective.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. New insights in the pathology of peritoneal surface malignancy.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kanwal P S RaghavDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology.
Aditya V Shetty
Syed M A Kazmi
Nianxiang Zhang
Jeffrey Morris
Melissa Taggart
Keith Fournier
Richard Royal
Paul Mansfield
Cathy Eng
Robert A Wolff
Michael J Overman
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USCancer Research And Biostatistics · USUniversity of Houston · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Targeting CDK4 in TGS-B Inactivated Gastrointestinal CancersP01CA130821 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI MISHRA, LOPA · 2008 to 2013
$6.9M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA130821NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledAppendiceal adenocarcinomas (AAs) are rare and this has limited their molecular understanding. The purpose of our study was to characterize the molecular profile of AA and explore the role of targeted therapy against cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). PATIENTS AND

methodsWe performed a retrospective review of 607 patients with AA at a single institution. A total of 149 patients underwent molecular testing for at least one of the following: activating mutations in KRAS, BRAF, cKIT, EGFR, or PI3K; protein expression of c-KIT or COX-2; or microsatellite instability (MSI) status by immunohistochemistry. Kaplan-Meier product limit method and log-rank test were used to estimate overall survival (OS) and to determine associations among OS, COX-2 expression, KRAS mutations, and other characteristics.

resultsAge, grade, stage, signet ring cells, mucinous histology, and completeness of cytoreduction score correlated with survival outcomes. COX-2 expression, KRAS, PI3K, and BRAF mutations were seen in 61%, 55%, 17%, and 4% of patients, respectively. High MSI was seen in 6% of patients. KRAS mutation was strongly associated with well differentiated or moderately differentiated AA (p < .01). COX-2 expression (p = .33) and the presence of KRAS mutation (p = .91) had no impact on OS. The use of celecoxib in patients whose tumors expressed COX-2 (p = .84) and the use of cetuximab or panitumumab in patients with KRAS wild-type tumors (p = .83) also had no impact on OS.

conclusionIn this cohort, we demonstrated that COX-2 expression and KRAS mutations were frequently seen in AA, although neither exhibited any prognostic significance. MSI was infrequent in AA. Targeted therapy against COX-2 and EGFR appeared to provide no clinical benefit. Well and moderately differentiated AA were molecularly distinct from poorly differentiated AA.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAppendiceal NeoplasmsCelecoxibCetuximabCyclooxygenase 2ErbB ReceptorsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMicrosatellite InstabilityMiddle AgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBRAF protein, humanCelecoxibCetuximabCyclooxygenase 2EGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsKRAS protein, humanPanitumumabPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)PTGS2 protein, humanPyrazolesras ProteinsSulfonamidesAppendix adenocarcinomaCelecoxibCetuximabCOX-2KRASMSI

Identifiers

PMID24149137
PMCPMC3868421
OpenAlexW2131853565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.