Trial reportThe oncologist2013
Impact of molecular alterations and targeted therapy in appendiceal adenocarcinomas.
Trial report in The oncologist, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of Systemic Chemotherapy in Patients With Low-grade Mucinous Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma: A Randomized Crossover Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- GNAS mutations as prognostic biomarker in patients with relapsed peritoneal pseudomyxoma receiving metronomic capecitabine and bevacizumab: a clinical and translational study.Journal of translational medicine · 2016Trial
- Next-Generation Sequencing Identifies Key Targetable Mutations in the Treatment of Appendiceal Neoplasms.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- Consensus Guideline for the Management of Patients with Appendiceal Tumors, Part 1: Appendiceal Tumors Without Peritoneal Involvement.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- The Genomic Topography of Appendiceal Cancers: Our Current Understanding, Clinical Perspectives, and Future Directions.Cancers · 2025Review
- Treatment of peritoneal disease arising from mucinous vs. non-mucinous appendiceal neoplasms with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.Pleura and peritoneum · 2025Article
- Article
- Neoplastic appendiceal mucinous lesions: a narrative review of the literature from an oncologist's perspective.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024Review
- Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel Is a Safe and Effective Therapeutic Strategy for Treating Mucinous Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma.Cancer research · 2023Article
- Landscape of Genetic Mutations in Appendiceal Cancers.Cancers · 2023Review
- Article
- The Landmark Series: Appendiceal Primary Peritoneal Surface Malignancy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2022Review
- The role of chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced appendiceal cancers: summary of the literature and future directions.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2022Review
- Systemic chemotherapy combined with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapy forInternational cancer conference journal · 2022Article
- New insights in the pathology of peritoneal surface malignancy.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021Review
- Consensuses and controversies on pseudomyxoma peritonei: a review of the published consensus statements and guidelines.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2021Review
- Integrated clinico-molecular profiling of appendiceal adenocarcinoma reveals a unique grade-driven entity distinct from colorectal cancer.British journal of cancer · 2020Article
- Blood-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis of Appendiceal Cancers.The oncologist · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
unlabelledAppendiceal adenocarcinomas (AAs) are rare and this has limited their molecular understanding. The purpose of our study was to characterize the molecular profile of AA and explore the role of targeted therapy against cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). PATIENTS AND
methodsWe performed a retrospective review of 607 patients with AA at a single institution. A total of 149 patients underwent molecular testing for at least one of the following: activating mutations in KRAS, BRAF, cKIT, EGFR, or PI3K; protein expression of c-KIT or COX-2; or microsatellite instability (MSI) status by immunohistochemistry. Kaplan-Meier product limit method and log-rank test were used to estimate overall survival (OS) and to determine associations among OS, COX-2 expression, KRAS mutations, and other characteristics.
resultsAge, grade, stage, signet ring cells, mucinous histology, and completeness of cytoreduction score correlated with survival outcomes. COX-2 expression, KRAS, PI3K, and BRAF mutations were seen in 61%, 55%, 17%, and 4% of patients, respectively. High MSI was seen in 6% of patients. KRAS mutation was strongly associated with well differentiated or moderately differentiated AA (p < .01). COX-2 expression (p = .33) and the presence of KRAS mutation (p = .91) had no impact on OS. The use of celecoxib in patients whose tumors expressed COX-2 (p = .84) and the use of cetuximab or panitumumab in patients with KRAS wild-type tumors (p = .83) also had no impact on OS.
conclusionIn this cohort, we demonstrated that COX-2 expression and KRAS mutations were frequently seen in AA, although neither exhibited any prognostic significance. MSI was infrequent in AA. Targeted therapy against COX-2 and EGFR appeared to provide no clinical benefit. Well and moderately differentiated AA were molecularly distinct from poorly differentiated AA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.