Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24148851›Full record

Trial reportTrials2013

Development and feasibility testing of decision support for patients who are candidates for a prophylactic implantable defibrillator: a study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Sandra L Carroll, Michael McGillion, Dawn Stacey, Jeff S Healey, Gina Browne, Heather M Arthur, Lehana Thabane

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01876173 (Development of and Feasibility Testing of Decision Support for Patients Who Are Candidates for an Implantable Defibrillator), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01876173 nacompletednot on this map

Development of and Feasibility Testing of Decision Support for Patients Who Are Candidates for an Implantable Defibrillator

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2012 to 2014Enrolled82ConditionsCardiovascular Disease, Sudden Cardiac DeathArmsPatient Decision Aid for an ICD (primary prevention, non-CRT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Shared decision making in IBD: A novel approach to trial consent and timing.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sandra L CarrollSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. carroll@mcmaster.ca.
Michael McGillion
Dawn Stacey
Jeff S Healey
Gina Browne
Heather M Arthur
Lehana Thabane
McMaster University · CAPopulation Health Research Institute · CASt. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton · CAThe Patients Association · GB

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research 119449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients, identified to be at risk for but who have never experienced a potentially lethal cardiac arrhythmia, have the option of receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) as prophylaxis against sudden cardiac death - a primary prevention indication. In Canada, there is no clear framework to support patients' decision-making for these devices. Decision support, using a decision aid, could moderate treatment-related uncertainty and prepare patients to make well-informed decisions. Patient decision aids provide information on treatment options, risks, and benefits, to help patients clarify their values for outcomes of treatment options. The objectives of this research are: 1) develop a decision aid, 2) evaluate the decision aid, and 3) determine the feasibility of conducting a trial. METHODS/

designA development panel comprised of the core investigative team, health service researchers, decision science experts, cardiovascular healthcare practitioners, and ICD patient representatives will collaborate to provide input on the content and format of the aid. To generate probabilities to include in the aid, we will synthesize primary prevention ICD evidence. To obtain anonymous input about the facts and content, we will employ a modified Delphi process. To evaluate the draft decision aid will invite ICD patients and their families (n = 30) to rate its acceptability. After we evaluate the aid, to determine the feasibility, we will conduct a feasibility pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) in new ICD candidates (n = 80). Participants will be randomized to receive a decision aid prior to specialist consultation versus usual care. Results from the pilot RCT will determine the feasibility of research processes; inform sample size calculation, measure decision quality (knowledge, values, decision conflict) and the influence of health related quality of life on decision-making. DISCUSSION: Our study seeks to develop a decision aid, for patients offered their first ICD for prophylaxis against sudden cardiac death. This paper outlines the background and methods of a pilot randomized trial which will inform a larger multicenter trial. Ultimately, decision support prior to specialist consultation could enhance the decision-making process between patients, physicians, and families, associated with life-prolonging medical devices like the ICD.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01876173.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesDefibrillators, ImplantablePatient SelectionResearch DesignArrhythmias, CardiacClinical ProtocolsDeath, Sudden, CardiacDelphi TechniqueElectric CountershockFeasibility StudiesHumansOntarioPatient ParticipationPhysician-Patient RelationsPilot ProjectsPredictive Value of Tests

Identifiers

PMID24148851
PMCPMC4015905
OpenAlexW2135979180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.