Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24148612›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2013

DNA repair in Mycoplasma gallisepticum.

Alexey Y Gorbachev, Gleb Y Fisunov, Mark Izraelson, Darya V Evsyutina, Pavel V Mazin, Dmitry G Alexeev, Olga V Pobeguts, Tatyana N Gorshkova, Sergey I Kovalchuk, Dmitry E Kamashev and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Bacterial conjugation in the ruminant pathogenApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Dynamics ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Data on genome analysis ofData in brief · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexey Y GorbachevResearch Institute of Physico-Chemical Medicine, Malaya Pirogovskaya 1a, Moscow 119992, Russian Federation. augorbachev@gmail.com.
Gleb Y Fisunov
Mark Izraelson
Darya V Evsyutina
Pavel V Mazin
Dmitry G Alexeev
Olga V Pobeguts
Tatyana N Gorshkova
Sergey I Kovalchuk
Dmitry E Kamashev
Vadim M Govorun
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University · RUInstitute of Bioorganic Chemistry · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA repair is essential for the maintenance of genome stability in all living beings. Genome size as well as the repertoire and abundance of DNA repair components may vary among prokaryotic species. The bacteria of the Mollicutes class feature a small genome size, absence of a cell wall, and a parasitic lifestyle. A small number of genes make Mollicutes a good model for a "minimal cell" concept.

resultsIn this work we studied the DNA repair system of Mycoplasma gallisepticum on genomic, transcriptional, and proteomic levels. We detected 18 out of 22 members of the DNA repair system on a protein level. We found that abundance of the respective mRNAs is less than one per cell. We studied transcriptional response of DNA repair genes of M. gallisepticum at stress conditions including heat, osmotic, peroxide stresses, tetracycline and ciprofloxacin treatment, stationary phase and heat stress in stationary phase.

conclusionsBased on comparative genomic study, we determined that the DNA repair system M. gallisepticum includes a sufficient set of proteins to provide a cell with functional nucleotide and base excision repair and mismatch repair. We identified SOS-response in M. gallisepticum on ciprofloxacin, which is a known SOS-inducer, tetracycline and heat stress in the absence of established regulators. Heat stress was found to be the strongest SOS-inducer. We found that upon transition to stationary phase of culture growth transcription of DNA repair genes decreases dramatically. Heat stress does not induce SOS-response in a stationary phase.

Indexed as

DNA RepairAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidDNA, BacterialDNA Repair EnzymesHydrogen PeroxideMycoplasma gallisepticumRecombinasesTandem Mass SpectrometryTemperatureTranscriptomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA Repair EnzymesHydrogen PeroxideRecombinases

Identifiers

PMID24148612
PMCPMC4007778
OpenAlexW1987692367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.