Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24147585›Full record

ReviewAntioxidants & redox signaling2014

Stem cell therapies for the treatment of radiation-induced normal tissue side effects.

Marc Benderitter, Fabio Caviggioli, Alain Chapel, Robert P Coppes, Chandan Guha, Marco Klinger, Olivier Malard, Fiona Stewart, Radia Tamarat, Peter van Luijk and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antioxidants & redox signaling, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Cell Therapies for Acute Radiation Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Marc Benderitter1 Laboratory of Radiopathology and Experimental Therapies, IRSN , PRP-HOM, SRBE, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France .
Fabio Caviggioli
Alain Chapel
Robert P Coppes
Chandan Guha
Marco Klinger
Olivier Malard
Fiona Stewart
Radia Tamarat
Peter van Luijk
Charles L Limoli
Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire · FRHumanitas University · ITUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USInserm · FRThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Translational strategies for protecting the brain against radio- and chemotherapyR01NS074388 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LIMOLI, CHARLES · 2011 to 2020
$3.5M
Preparative irradiation for hepatocyte transplantationR01DK064670 · NIDDK · ALBERT EINSTEIN COL OF MED YESHIVA UNIV · PI GUHA, CHANDAN · 2005 to 2009
$1.9M
MR Spectroscopy to Evaluate Liver Repopulation by Transplanted HepatocytesR33CA121051 · NCI · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI GUHA, CHANDAN · 2010 to 2011
$957k
MR Spectroscopy to Evaluate Liver Repopulation by Transplanted HepatocytesR21CA121051 · NCI · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI GUHA, CHANDAN · 2007 to 2009
$452k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS074388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceTargeted irradiation is an effective cancer therapy but damage inflicted to normal tissues surrounding the tumor may cause severe complications. While certain pharmacologic strategies can temper the adverse effects of irradiation, stem cell therapies provide unique opportunities for restoring functionality to the irradiated tissue bed. RECENT ADVANCES: Preclinical studies presented in this review provide encouraging proof of concept regarding the therapeutic potential of stem cells for treating the adverse side effects associated with radiotherapy in different organs. Early-stage clinical data for radiation-induced lung, bone, and skin complications are promising and highlight the importance of selecting the appropriate stem cell type to stimulate tissue regeneration. CRITICAL ISSUES: While therapeutic efficacy has been demonstrated in a variety of animal models and human trials, a range of additional concerns regarding stem cell transplantation for ameliorating radiation-induced normal tissue sequelae remain. Safety issues regarding teratoma formation, disease progression, and genomic stability along with technical issues impacting disease targeting, immunorejection, and clinical scale-up are factors bearing on the eventual translation of stem cell therapies into routine clinical practice. FUTURE DIRECTIONS: Follow-up studies will need to identify the best possible stem cell types for the treatment of early and late radiation-induced normal tissue injury. Additional work should seek to optimize cellular dosing regimes, identify the best routes of administration, elucidate optimal transplantation windows for introducing cells into more receptive host tissues, and improve immune tolerance for longer-term engrafted cell survival into the irradiated microenvironment.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansNeoplasmsRadiation InjuriesStem Cell Transplantation

Identifiers

PMID24147585
PMCPMC4060814
OpenAlexW2077123113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.