ArticlePloS one2013
How psychiatry journals support the unbiased translation of clinical research. A cross-sectional study of editorial policies.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reporting quality of animal research in journals that published the ARRIVE 1.0 or ARRIVE 2.0 guidelines: a cross-sectional analysis of 943 studies.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2024Article
- Transparent, Open, and Reproducible Prevention Science.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022Article
- Registry versus publication: discrepancy of primary outcomes and possible outcome reporting bias in child and adolescent mental health.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2022Observational
- Review
- Requirements for Study Registration and Adherence to Reporting Guidelines in Surgery Journals: A Cross-Sectional Study.World journal of surgery · 2021Article
- Low dissemination rates, non-transparency of trial premature cessation and late registration in child mental health: observational study of registered interventional trials.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2020Observational
- Linking Personality Traits to Individual Differences in Affective Spaces.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- The cumulative effect of reporting and citation biases on the apparent efficacy of treatments: the case of depression.Psychological medicine · 2018Article
- Structure formats of randomised controlled trial abstracts: a cross-sectional analysis of their current usage and association with methodology reporting.BMC medical research methodology · 2018Article
- Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review.Systematic reviews · 2017Article
- Why prudence is needed when interpreting articles reporting clinical trial results in mental health.Trials · 2017Article
- Article
- Overstatements in abstract conclusions claiming effectiveness of interventions in psychiatry: A meta-epidemiological investigation.PloS one · 2017Article
- Guidance in author instructions of hematology and oncology journals: A cross sectional and longitudinal study.PloS one · 2017Article
- Stroke rehabilitation. A call to action in Saudi Arabia.Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) · 2016Review
- Updating standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy: the development of STARD 2015.Research integrity and peer review · 2016Article
- Do surgery journals insist on reporting by CONSORT and PRISMA? A follow-up survey of 'instructions to authors'.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2015Article
- Observational
- How transparent are migraine clinical trials? Repository of Registered Migraine Trials (RReMiT).Neurology · 2014Article
- Quality of psychiatry journals published from India: Insights for readers, researchers, and publishers.Indian journal of psychiatryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionReporting guidelines (e.g. CONSORT) have been developed as tools to improve quality and reduce bias in reporting research findings. Trial registration has been recommended for countering selective publication. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) encourages the implementation of reporting guidelines and trial registration as uniform requirements (URM). For the last two decades, however, biased reporting and insufficient registration of clinical trials has been identified in several literature reviews and other investigations. No study has so far investigated the extent to which author instructions in psychiatry journals encourage following reporting guidelines and trial registration.
methodPsychiatry Journals were identified from the 2011 Journal Citation Report. Information given in the author instructions and during the submission procedure of all journals was assessed on whether major reporting guidelines, trial registration and the ICMJE's URM in general were mentioned and adherence recommended.
resultsWe included 123 psychiatry journals (English and German language) in our analysis. A minority recommend or require 1) following the URM (21%), 2) adherence to reporting guidelines such as CONSORT, PRISMA, STROBE (23%, 7%, 4%), or 3) registration of clinical trials (34%). The subsample of the top-10 psychiatry journals (ranked by impact factor) provided much better but still improvable rates. For example, 70% of the top-10 psychiatry journals do not ask for the specific trial registration number. DISCUSSION: Under the assumption that better reported and better registered clinical research that does not lack substantial information will improve the understanding, credibility, and unbiased translation of clinical research findings, several stakeholders including readers (physicians, patients), authors, reviewers, and editors might benefit from improved author instructions in psychiatry journals. A first step of improvement would consist in requiring adherence to the broadly accepted reporting guidelines and to trial registration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.