ArticlePloS one2013
Network bursting dynamics in excitatory cortical neuron cultures results from the combination of different adaptive mechanisms.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Hierarchical Afferent Connectivity Drives Population-Wide Bursting Dynamics in a Computational Model of Human-Derived Excitatory Neuronal Networks.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Brain Extracellular Space: From an Overlooked Dimension to Catalyst of a Novel Neuroscience Paradigm.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- WhenAPL bioengineering · 2025Review
- Automated inference of disease mechanisms in patient-hiPSC-derived neuronal networks.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Digitoids: a novel computational platform for mimicking oxygen-dependent firing of neuronsFrontiers in neuroinformatics · 2025Article
- Breaking the burst: Unveiling mechanisms behind fragmented network bursts in patient-derived neurons.Stem cell reports · 2024Article
- Time-dependent homeostatic mechanisms underlie brain-derived neurotrophic factor action on neural circuitry.Communications biology · 2023Article
- An in silico and in vitro human neuronal network model reveals cellular mechanisms beyond NaStem cell reports · 2023Article
- Loss of neuron network coherence induced by virus-infected astrocytes: a model study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Disruption of the autism-associated geneFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023Article
- Partial information decomposition reveals that synergistic neural integration is greater downstream of recurrent information flow in organotypic cortical cultures.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Embedding optimization reveals long-lasting history dependence in neural spiking activity.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Cytosolic PSD-95 interactor alters functional organization of neural circuits and AMPA receptor signaling independent of PSD-95 binding.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2021Article
- Unstructured network topology begets order-based representation by privileged neurons.Biological cybernetics · 2020Article
- Simple model of complex dynamics of activity patterns in developing networks of neuronal cultures.PloS one · 2019Article
- Spontaneous activity emerging from an inferred network model captures complex spatio-temporal dynamics of spike data.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Challenges in Reproducibility, Replicability, and Comparability of Computational Models and Tools for Neuronal and Glial Networks, Cells, and Subcellular Structures.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2018Article
- Understanding the Generation of Network Bursts by Adaptive Oscillatory Neurons.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
- Recurrently connected and localized neuronal communities initiate coordinated spontaneous activity in neuronal networks.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the brain, synchronization among cells of an assembly is a common phenomenon, and thought to be functionally relevant. Here we used an in vitro experimental model of cell assemblies, cortical cultures, combined with numerical simulations of a spiking neural network (SNN) to investigate how and why spontaneous synchronization occurs. In order to deal with excitation only, we pharmacologically blocked GABAAergic transmission using bicuculline. Synchronous events in cortical cultures tend to involve almost every cell and to display relatively constant durations. We have thus named these "network spikes" (NS). The inter-NS-intervals (INSIs) proved to be a more interesting phenomenon. In most cortical cultures NSs typically come in series or bursts ("bursts of NSs", BNS), with short (~1 s) INSIs and separated by long silent intervals (tens of s), which leads to bimodal INSI distributions. This suggests that a facilitating mechanism is at work, presumably short-term synaptic facilitation, as well as two fatigue mechanisms: one with a short timescale, presumably short-term synaptic depression, and another one with a longer timescale, presumably cellular adaptation. We thus incorporated these three mechanisms into the SNN, which, indeed, produced realistic BNSs. Next, we systematically varied the recurrent excitation for various adaptation timescales. Strong excitability led to frequent, quasi-periodic BNSs (CV~0), and weak excitability led to rare BNSs, approaching a Poisson process (CV~1). Experimental cultures appear to operate within an intermediate weakly-synchronized regime (CV~0.5), with an adaptation timescale in the 2-8 s range, and well described by a Poisson-with-refractory-period model. Taken together, our results demonstrate that the INSI statistics are indeed informative: they allowed us to infer the mechanisms at work, and many parameters that we cannot access experimentally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.