Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24146763›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Contribution of priority PAHs and POPs to Ah receptor-mediated activities in sediment samples from the River Elbe Estuary, Germany.

Jens C Otte, Steffen Keiter, Christopher Faßbender, Eric B Higley, Paula Suares Rocha, Markus Brinkmann, Dierk-Steffen Wahrendorf, Werner Manz, Markus A Wetzel, Thomas Braunbeck and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated potencies in field-deployed plastics vary by type of polymer.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Jens C OtteKIT - Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Toxicology and Genetics, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Steffen Keiter
Christopher Faßbender
Eric B Higley
Paula Suares Rocha
Markus Brinkmann
Dierk-Steffen Wahrendorf
Werner Manz
Markus A Wetzel
Thomas Braunbeck
John P Giesy
Markus Hecker
Henner Hollert
Heidelberg University · DERWTH Aachen University · DEFederal Institute of Hydrology · DEUniversity of Saskatchewan · CACity University of Hong Kong · HKKarlsruhe Institute of Technology · DEUniversity of Koblenz and Landau · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The estuary of the River Elbe between Hamburg and the North Sea (Germany) is a sink for contaminated sediment and suspended particulate matter (SPM). One major concern is the effect of human activities on the hydrodynamics, particularly the intensive dredging activities in this area that may result in remobilization of sediment-bound pollutants. The aim of this study was to identify pollutants contributing to the toxicological risk associated with re-suspension of sediments in the Elbe Estuary by use of an effect-directed analysis that combines chemical and biological analyses in with specific fractionation techniques. Sediments were collected from sites along the Elbe Estuary and a site from a small harbor basin of the Elbe Estuary that is known to be polluted. The sixteen priority EPA-PAHs were quantified in organic extracts of sediments. In addition, dioxin equivalents of sediments were investigated by use of the 7-ethoxyresorufin O-deethylase assay with RTL-W1 cells and the Ah receptor-mediated luciferase transactivation assay with H4IIE-luc cells. Quantification of the 16 priority PAHs revealed that sediments were moderately contaminated at all of the sites in the Elbe River Estuary (<0.02-0.906 µg/g dw). Sediments contained relatively small concentrations of dioxin equivalents (Bio-TEQ) with concentrations ranging from 15.5 to 322 pg/g dw, which were significantly correlated with dioxin equivalents calculated based on toxicity reference values and concentrations of PAH. The concentration of Bio-TEQ at the reference site exceeded 200,000 pg/g dw. In a potency balance the 16 PAHs explained between 47 and 118% of the Bio-TEQ in the luciferase assay, which can be explained by the constant input of PAHs bound to SPM from the upper course of the Elbe River into its estuary. Successful identification of a significant portion of dioxin-like activity to priority PAHs in complex environmental samples such as sediments has rarely been reported.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological AssayCell LineCytochrome P-450 CYP1A1DioxinsEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutantsEnzyme ActivationEstuariesGenes, ReporterGeologic SedimentsGermanyHepatocytesHumansLuciferasesOncorhynchus mykissCytochrome P-450 CYP1A1DioxinsEnvironmental PollutantsLuciferasesParticulate MatterPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsReceptors, Aryl Hydrocarbon

Identifiers

PMID24146763
PMCPMC3795708
OpenAlexW2089600386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.