ArticlePLoS computational biology2013
Reconstructing the genomic content of microbiome taxa through shotgun metagenomic deconvolution.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Accurate estimation of intraspecific microbial gene content variation in metagenomic data with MIDAS v3 and StrainPGC.Genome research · 2025Article
- Article
- Genome reconstruction and haplotype phasing using chromosome conformation capture methodologies.Briefings in functional genomics · 2020Article
- Taxa-function robustness in microbial communities.Microbiome · 2018Article
- Identification of a novel interspecific hybrid yeast from a metagenomic spontaneously inoculated beer sample using Hi-C.Yeast (Chichester, England) · 2018Article
- BURRITO: An Interactive Multi-Omic Tool for Visualizing Taxa-Function Relationships in Microbiome Data.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Systematic Characterization and Analysis of the Taxonomic Drivers of Functional Shifts in the Human Microbiome.Cell host & microbe · 2017Article
- High-resolution characterization of the human microbiome.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2017Review
- Capturing the most wanted taxa through cross-sample correlations.The ISME journal · 2016Article
- Metagenomic Assembly: Overview, Challenges and Applications.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2016Review
- Review
- Metabolic network-guided binning of metagenomic sequence fragments.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2016Article
- Increasing Metagenomic Resolution of Microbiome Interactions Through Functional Phylogenomics and Bacterial Sub-Communities.Frontiers in genetics · 2016Article
- Metagenome Analysis Exploiting High-Throughput Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C) Data.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2015Review
- Environmental genes and genomes: understanding the differences and challenges in the approaches and software for their analyses.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Taxator-tk: precise taxonomic assignment of metagenomes by fast approximation of evolutionary neighborhoods.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2015Article
- Computational Studies of the Intestinal Host-Microbiota Interactome.Computation (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Article
- Article
- Human microbiomes and their roles in dysbiosis, common diseases, and novel therapeutic approaches.Frontiers in microbiology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metagenomics has transformed our understanding of the microbial world, allowing researchers to bypass the need to isolate and culture individual taxa and to directly characterize both the taxonomic and gene compositions of environmental samples. However, associating the genes found in a metagenomic sample with the specific taxa of origin remains a critical challenge. Existing binning methods, based on nucleotide composition or alignment to reference genomes allow only a coarse-grained classification and rely heavily on the availability of sequenced genomes from closely related taxa. Here, we introduce a novel computational framework, integrating variation in gene abundances across multiple samples with taxonomic abundance data to deconvolve metagenomic samples into taxa-specific gene profiles and to reconstruct the genomic content of community members. This assembly-free method is not bounded by various factors limiting previously described methods of metagenomic binning or metagenomic assembly and represents a fundamentally different approach to metagenomic-based genome reconstruction. An implementation of this framework is available at http://elbo.gs.washington.edu/software.html. We first describe the mathematical foundations of our framework and discuss considerations for implementing its various components. We demonstrate the ability of this framework to accurately deconvolve a set of metagenomic samples and to recover the gene content of individual taxa using synthetic metagenomic samples. We specifically characterize determinants of prediction accuracy and examine the impact of annotation errors on the reconstructed genomes. We finally apply metagenomic deconvolution to samples from the Human Microbiome Project, successfully reconstructing genus-level genomic content of various microbial genera, based solely on variation in gene count. These reconstructed genera are shown to correctly capture genus-specific properties. With the accumulation of metagenomic data, this deconvolution framework provides an essential tool for characterizing microbial taxa never before seen, laying the foundation for addressing fundamental questions concerning the taxa comprising diverse microbial communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.