Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24146271›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2013

Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography analysis in deprivational amblyopia: a pilot study with unilateral pediatric cataract patients.

Yong Woo Kim, Seong-Joon Kim, Young Suk Yu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Analysis of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in anisometropic amblyopia via optic coherence tomography.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Yong Woo KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea.
Seong-Joon Kim
Young Suk Yu
Seoul National University Hospital · KRNew Generation University College · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo investigate whether macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) structure differs among deprivational amblyopic eyes, fellow non-amblyopic eyes, and age-matched normal eyes, using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).

methodsMacula and optic disc of 14 unilateral pseudophakic children with deprivational amblyopia, and 14 age-matched normal children (mean age, 7.45 ± 2.57 years) were scanned with Cirrus(TM) HD-OCT. Macular, RNFL, and macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thicknesses were measured, and compared between the eyes after correction for axial length-related magnification errors.

resultsThe average RNFL thickness tended to be greater in amblyopic eyes (99.64 ± 10.11 μm) than in fellow non-amblyopic eyes (97.28 ± 12.34 μm) and normal eyes (95.38 ± 9.74 μm), but did not show statistical significance (p = 0.429, p = 0.286 respectively). The nasal RNFL thickness was significantly greater in amblyopic eyes (75.84 ± 19.22 μm) than in fellow non-amblyopic eyes (63.42 ± 14.05 μm, p = 0.037) and normal eyes (62.38 ± 9.65 μm, p = 0.043). The central macular thickness in amblyopic eyes (237.05 ± 37.74 μm) showed no significant differences compared to those of fellow non-amblyopic eyes (226.67 ± 34.71 μm) and normal eyes (233.74 ± 27.11 μm) (p = 0.137, p = 0.792 respectively). The macular GCIPL thickness showed no significant difference among the amblyopic, fellow non-amblyopic, and normal eyes (average; 78.94 ± 6.35 μm vs 78.77 ± 6.43 μm vs 82.22 ± 5.00 μm respectively, p > 0.05).

conclusionsSD-OCT analysis of deprivational amblyopic eyes with unilateral pediatric cataract demonstrated significant increase in nasal RNFL thickness compared to fellow non-amblyopic eyes and age-matched normal eyes. The macular and macular GCIPL thickness did not show any significant difference. Taken together, monocular pattern deprivation in early childhood may have changed the nasal peripapillary RNFL structure.

Indexed as

Sensory DeprivationAmblyopiaCataractCataract ExtractionChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantLens Implantation, IntraocularMaleNerve FibersOptic DiskPilot ProjectsRetinal Ganglion CellsTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID24146271
OpenAlexW2034444895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.