Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24146072›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2014

Calculation of membrane tension in selected sections of the pelvic floor.

Yves Ozog, Jan Deprest, Kim Haest, Filip Claus, Dirk De Ridder, Edoardo Mazza

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yves OzogCentre for Surgical Technologies, Faculty of Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jan Deprest
Kim Haest
Filip Claus
Dirk De Ridder
Edoardo Mazza

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisA mathematical model to estimate membrane tensions (Mt) at the urogenital hiatus and midpelvis in patients with and without prolapse is proposed. For that purpose the complex structures of the pelvic floor were simplified and, based on assumptions concerning geometry and loading conditions, Laplace's law was used to calculate Mt. The pelvic cavity is represented by an ellipsoid in which the midpelvic and hiatal sections are described by an ellipse. The downwards forces within the pelvis (F(in)) are in equilibrium with the support forces within its walls (F(w)). F(in) is the abdominal pressure (PABD) multiplied by the area A of the ellipse. The force inside the tissues (F(w)) is distributed along the circumference of the ellipse C. The Mt can be approximated as Mt = (PABD.A)/C (N/m). Mt-α accounts for the angle α which describes tissue orientation with respect to the anatomical section and is calculated as Mt-α = Mt/sin(α).

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study on archived magnetic resonance imaging scans (n = 20) and ultrasound images in patients with (n = 50) or without prolapse (n = 50) and measured actual geometrical variables. PABD was measured in patients with and without prolapse (n = 20).

resultsMt at the urogenital hiatus at rest is 0.35 N/cm. They significantly increase with the Valsalva manoeuvre, by a factor of 2.3 (without prolapse) to 3.6 (with prolapse).

conclusionsCalculated Mt are much lower than what is reported for the abdominal cavity. Prolapse patients have significantly larger Mt, which during the Valsalva manoeuvre increase more than in healthy subjects.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedMucous MembranePelvic FloorPelvic Organ ProlapsePressureStress, MechanicalUltrasonography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.