Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24145987›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2013

Latest biopsy approach for suspected metastases in patients with breast cancer.

Naoki Niikura, Bruno C Odisio, Yutaka Tokuda, Fraser W Symmans, Gabriel N Hortobagyi, Naoto T Ueno

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Current Trends of Raman Spectroscopy in Clinic Settings: Opportunities and Challenges.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  4. Vaccines in Breast Cancer: Challenges and Breakthroughs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Naoki NiikuraDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara-shi, Kanagawa, 259-1193, Japan.
Bruno C Odisio
Yutaka Tokuda
Fraser W Symmans
Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Naoto T Ueno

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biopsy of suspected metastases in patients with breast cancer is recommended in the practice guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, but not always performed in routine oncology practice, often because of the cost and invasiveness of the procedure. Biopsies can confirm the presence of metastatic disease, reveal unsuspected benign disease or second (non-breast) malignancies and confirm expression of biomarkers, all of which can aid the optimal management of the cancer. Image-guided biopsy has increased the accuracy and safety of the procedure. Here, we aim to provide a practical algorithm for deciding when to perform biopsy of suspected breast cancer metastases, in order to optimize clinical practice. We expect that future clinical trials and standard-of-care practice will increasingly obtain tissue from metastases to assess molecular differences (DNA, RNA, protein) between the primary tumour and metastases. Advances in targeted therapy for breast cancer will be highly dependent on the availability of metastatic tissue. In this article, we provide an up-to-date review of the current issues in biopsy of suspected metastases in patients with breast cancer, including technical details of biopsy, pathology review of biopsy specimens, and interpretation of biopsy findings.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBiopsyBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansNeoplasm MetastasisBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.