ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2013
Latest biopsy approach for suspected metastases in patients with breast cancer.
Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated classification of pathological differentiation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma using combined radiomics models from CET1WI and T2WI.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
- Tumor-derived extracellular vesicles as a biomarker for breast cancer diagnosis and metastasis monitoring.iScience · 2024Article
- Current Trends of Raman Spectroscopy in Clinic Settings: Opportunities and Challenges.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Vaccines in Breast Cancer: Challenges and Breakthroughs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Spindle Cell Sarcoma Mimicking Supraclavicular Lymph Node Metastasis of Breast Cancer.The American journal of case reports · 2019Article
- International Consensus on the Clinical Management of Inflammatory Breast Cancer from the Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program 10th Anniversary Conference.Journal of Cancer · 2018Article
- Using tumour phylogenetics to identify the roots of metastasis in humans.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biopsy of suspected metastases in patients with breast cancer is recommended in the practice guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, but not always performed in routine oncology practice, often because of the cost and invasiveness of the procedure. Biopsies can confirm the presence of metastatic disease, reveal unsuspected benign disease or second (non-breast) malignancies and confirm expression of biomarkers, all of which can aid the optimal management of the cancer. Image-guided biopsy has increased the accuracy and safety of the procedure. Here, we aim to provide a practical algorithm for deciding when to perform biopsy of suspected breast cancer metastases, in order to optimize clinical practice. We expect that future clinical trials and standard-of-care practice will increasingly obtain tissue from metastases to assess molecular differences (DNA, RNA, protein) between the primary tumour and metastases. Advances in targeted therapy for breast cancer will be highly dependent on the availability of metastatic tissue. In this article, we provide an up-to-date review of the current issues in biopsy of suspected metastases in patients with breast cancer, including technical details of biopsy, pathology review of biopsy specimens, and interpretation of biopsy findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24145987What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.