Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24145423›Full record

Trial reportProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2013

Human genome-guided identification of memory-modulating drugs.

Andreas Papassotiropoulos, Christiane Gerhards, Angela Heck, Sandra Ackermann, Amanda Aerni, Nathalie Schicktanz, Bianca Auschra, Philippe Demougin, Eva Mumme, Thomas Elbert and 13 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Computational dissection of human episodic memory reveals mental process-specific genetic profiles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Andreas PapassotiropoulosDepartment of Psychology, Division of Molecular Neuroscience, Psychiatric University Clinics, Transfaculty Research Platform, Department Biozentrum, Life Sciences Training Facility, and Department of Psychology, Division of Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Basel, 4055 Basel, Switzerland.
Christiane Gerhards
Angela Heck
Sandra Ackermann
Amanda Aerni
Nathalie Schicktanz
Bianca Auschra
Philippe Demougin
Eva Mumme
Thomas Elbert
Verena Ertl
Leo Gschwind
Edveena Hanser
Kim-Dung Huynh
Frank Jessen
Iris-Tatjana Kolassa
Annette Milnik
Paolo Paganetti
Klara Spalek
Christian Vogler
Andreas Muhs
Andrea Pfeifer
Dominique J-F de Quervain
Laboratory of Molecular Genetics · PLUniversity of Basel · CHAC Immune (Switzerland) · CHUniversity of Konstanz · DEUniversity Psychiatric Hospital · SIUniversity Hospital Magdeburg · DEUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last decade there has been an exponential increase in knowledge about the genetic basis of complex human traits, including neuropsychiatric disorders. It is not clear, however, to what extent this knowledge can be used as a starting point for drug identification, one of the central hopes of the human genome project. The aim of the present study was to identify memory-modulating compounds through the use of human genetic information. We performed a multinational collaborative study, which included assessment of aversive memory--a trait central to posttraumatic stress disorder--and a gene-set analysis in healthy individuals. We identified 20 potential drug target genes in two genomewide-corrected gene sets: the neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction and the long-term depression gene set. In a subsequent double-blind, placebo-controlled study in healthy volunteers, we aimed at providing a proof of concept for the genome-guided identification of memory modulating compounds. Pharmacological intervention at the neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction gene set led to significant reduction of aversive memory. The findings demonstrate that genome information, along with appropriate data mining methodology, can be used as a starting point for the identification of memory-modulating compounds.

Indexed as

AdultCross-Over StudiesData MiningDiphenhydramineDrug DiscoveryFemaleFluorometryGenome, HumanGenotypeHumansInterviews as TopicLogistic ModelsMaleMemoryOligonucleotidesPolymerase Chain ReactionDiphenhydramineOligonucleotidesemotional memorypharmacologyPTSD

Identifiers

PMID24145423
PMCPMC3831994
OpenAlexW2123383233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.