Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24145376›Full record

ArticleMolecular psychiatry2014

Epistatic interaction between COMT and DTNBP1 modulates prefrontal function in mice and in humans.

F Papaleo, M C Burdick, J H Callicott, D R Weinberger

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Tolcapone-Enhanced Neurocognition in Healthy Adults: Neural Basis and Predictors.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2017
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genetic Interaction betweenInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Impaired copper transport in schizophrenia results in a copper-deficient brain state: A new side to the dysbindin story.The world journal of biological psychiatry : the official journal of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

F Papaleo1] Department of Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy [2] Department of Scienze del Farmaco, Universita' degli Studi di Padova, Padova, Italy [3] Clinical Brain Disorders Branch, Genes, Cognition and Psychosis Program, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
M C BurdickClinical Brain Disorders Branch, Genes, Cognition and Psychosis Program, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
J H CallicottClinical Brain Disorders Branch, Genes, Cognition and Psychosis Program, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
D R Weinberger1] Clinical Brain Disorders Branch, Genes, Cognition and Psychosis Program, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA [2] Lieber Institute for Brain Development, Johns Hopkins University Medical Campus, Baltimore, MD, USA [3] Departments of Psychiatry, Neurology, Neuroscience and the McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
National Institute of Mental Health · USItalian Institute of Technology · IT

Funding

Multimodal Imaging: Genetic and Environmental Effects in NeuropsychiatryZIAMH002942 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI BERMAN, KAREN FAITH · 2013 to 2022
$12.2M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 MH999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive functions are highly heritable and the impact of complex genetic interactions, though undoubtedly important, has received little investigation. Here we show in an animal model and in a human neuroimaging experiment a consistent non-linear interaction between two genes--catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) and dysbindin (dys; dystrobrevin-binding protein 1 (DTNBP1))--implicated through different mechanisms in cortical dopamine signaling and prefrontal cognitive function. In mice, we found that a single genetic mutation reducing expression of either COMT or DTNBP1 alone produced working memory advantages, while, in dramatic contrast, genetic reduction of both in the same mouse produced working memory deficits. We found evidence of the same non-linear genetic interaction in prefrontal cortical function in humans. In healthy volunteers (N=176) studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging during a working memory paradigm, individuals homozygous for the COMT rs4680 Met allele that reduces COMT enzyme activity showed a relatively more efficient prefrontal engagement. In contrast, we found that the same genotype was less efficient on the background of a dys haplotype associated with decreased DTNBP1 expression. These results illustrate that epistasis can be functionally multi-directional and non-linear and that a putatively beneficial allele in one epistastic context is a relatively deleterious one in another. These data also have important implications for single-locus association analyses of complex traits.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticAllelesAnimalsCarrier ProteinsCatechol O-MethyltransferaseDysbindinDystrophin-Associated ProteinsFunctional NeuroimagingGene Expression RegulationHomozygoteHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMaze LearningMemory, Short-TermMiceCarrier ProteinsCatechol O-MethyltransferaseDTNBP1 protein, humanDtnbp1 protein, mouseDysbindinDystrophin-Associated Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24145376
PMCPMC4845721
OpenAlexW2001978906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.