Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24144880›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of physiology2014

Phase-shifting response to light in older adults.

Seong Jae Kim, Susan Benloucif, Kathryn Jean Reid, Sandra Weintraub, Nancy Kennedy, Lisa F Wolfe, Phyllis C Zee

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Assessment of Circadian Rhythms.Neurologic clinics · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Seong Jae KimS. J. Kim: Abbott Hall, 5th Floor, 710 North Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. seong.kim@northwestern.edu.
Susan Benloucif
Kathryn Jean Reid
Sandra Weintraub
Nancy Kennedy
Lisa F Wolfe
Phyllis C Zee
Neurology, Inc · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

SLOW WAVE SLEEP AND TYPE 2 DIABETES RISK IN AGINGP01AG011412 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ZEE, PHYLLIS C. · 1994 to 2021
$31.5M
Neuropathology CoreP30AG013854 · NIA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BIGIO, EILEEN H. · 1996 to 2020
$28.9M
RESPONSIVENESS OF THE AGING CIRCADIAN CLOCK TO LIGHTR01HL067604 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI BENLOUCIF, SUSAN J · 2000 to 2004
$1.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL67604NIA NIH HHS AG13854NIA NIH HHS P01 AG11412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age-related changes in circadian rhythms may contribute to the sleep disruption observed in older adults. A reduction in responsiveness to photic stimuli in the circadian timing system has been hypothesized as a possible reason for the advanced circadian phase in older adults. This project compared phase-shifting responses to 2 h of broad-spectrum white light at moderate and high intensities in younger and older adults. Subjects included 29 healthy young (25.1 ± 4.1 years; male to female ratio: 8: 21) and 16 healthy older (66.5 ± 6.0 years; male to female ratio: 5: 11) subjects, who participated in two 4-night and 3-day laboratory stays, separated by at least 3 weeks. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of three different time-points, 8 h before (-8), 3 h before (-3) or 3 h after (+3) the core body temperature minimum (CBTmin) measured on the baseline night. For each condition, subjects were exposed in a randomized order to 2 h light pulses of two intensities (2000 lux and 8000 lux) during the two different laboratory stays. Phase shifts were analysed according to the time of melatonin midpoint on the nights before and after light exposure. Older subjects in this study showed an earlier baseline phase and lower amplitude of melatonin rhythm compared to younger subjects, but there was no evidence of age-related changes in the magnitude or direction of phase shifts of melatonin midpoint in response to 2 h of light at either 2000 lux or 8000 lux. These results indicate that the acute phase-shifting response to moderate- or high-intensity broad spectrum light is not significantly affected by age.

Indexed as

LightAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBody TemperatureCircadian RhythmFemaleHumansMaleMelatoninMiddle AgedPhotic StimulationMelatonin

Identifiers

PMID24144880
PMCPMC3903359
OpenAlexW2123631888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.