Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24144641›Full record

ReviewBlood2013

Smoldering multiple myeloma requiring treatment: time for a new definition?

Angela Dispenzieri, A Keith Stewart, Asher Chanan-Khan, S Vincent Rajkumar, Robert A Kyle, Rafael Fonseca, Prashant Kapoor, P Leif Bergsagel, Arleigh McCurdy, Morie A Gertz and 13 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Shall we treat smoldering multiple myeloma in the near future?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2017
    Review
  15. Challenges and Promises of Genetic Stratification of Risk in Multiple Myeloma.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Recent advances in multiple myeloma: a Korean perspective.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2016
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Angela DispenzieriDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN;
A Keith Stewart
Asher Chanan-Khan
S Vincent Rajkumar
Robert A Kyle
Rafael Fonseca
Prashant Kapoor
P Leif Bergsagel
Arleigh McCurdy
Morie A Gertz
Martha Q Lacy
John A Lust
Stephen J Russell
Steven R Zeldenrust
Craig Reeder
Vivek Roy
Francis Buadi
David Dingli
Suzanne R Hayman
Nelson Leung
Yi Lin
Joseph Mikhael
Shaji K Kumar

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity Enders · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Mouse models of age-associated monoclonal gammopathyR01AG020686 · NIA · WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIV · PI BERGSAGEL, PETER LEIF · 2003 to 2014
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NIA NIH HHS R01 AG020686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) bridges the gap between monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (a mostly premalignant disorder) and active multiple myeloma (MM). Until recently, no interventional study in patients with SMM showed improved overall survival (OS) with therapy as compared with observation. A report from the PETHEMA-GEM (Programa Español de Tratamientos en Hematologica) group described both fewer myeloma-related events and better OS among patients with high-risk SMM who were treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. This unique study prompted us to review current knowledge about SMM and address the following questions: (1) Are there patients currently defined as SMM who should be treated routinely? (2) Should the definitions of SMM and MM be reconsidered? (3) Has the time come when not treating is more dangerous than treating? (4) Could unintended medical harm result from overzealous intervention? Our conclusion is that those patients with the highest-risk SMM (extreme bone marrow plasmacytosis, extremely abnormal serum immunoglobulin free light chain ratio, and multiple bone lesions detected only by modern imaging) should be reclassified as active MM so that they can receive MM-appropriate therapy and the paradigm of careful observation for patients with SMM can be preserved.

Indexed as

Terminology as TopicDisease ProgressionHumansParaproteinemiasPolymyositisPrecancerous ConditionsRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID24144641
PMCPMC3952477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.