Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24144412›Full record

ArticleFuture medicinal chemistry2013

Novel 3-nitro-1H-1,2,4-triazole-based compounds as potential anti-Chagasic drugs: in vivo studies.

Maria V Papadopoulou, William D Bloomer, Howard S Rosenzweig, Rachel Ashworth, Shane R Wilkinson, Marcel Kaiser, Grasiella Andriani, Ana Rodriguez

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future medicinal chemistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Anti-Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Review on Experimental Treatment Strategies AgainstJournal of experimental pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Antitrypanosomal activity of 5-nitro-2-aminothiazole-based compounds.European journal of medicinal chemistry · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Maria V PapadopoulouNorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA.
William D Bloomer
Howard S Rosenzweig
Rachel Ashworth
Shane R Wilkinson
Marcel Kaiser
Grasiella Andriani
Ana Rodriguez
New York University · USNorthShore University HealthSystem · USQueen Mary University of London · GBOakton Community College · USUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

Drug Discovery Consortium for Chagas DiseaseR01AI082542 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI TARLETON, RICK L · 2009 to 2010
$2.2M
NIAID NIH HHS 1R01AI082542-01NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI082542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChagas disease is caused by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, is endemic in Latin America and leads to an estimated 14,000 deaths per year and around 100 million people at risk of infection. Drugs currently used in the treatment of Chagas are old, partially effective and have numerous side effects. METHODOLOGY: We have previously reported that 3-nitro-1H-1,2,4-triazole-based compounds demonstrate significant and selective activity against T. cruzi amastigotes in infected L6 cells via activation of a type I nitroreductase, specific to trypanosomatids. In the present work we evaluated in vivo 13 of these compounds based on their high in vitro potency against T. cruzi (IC50 < 1 µM) and selectivity (SI: toxicity to L6 cells/toxicity against T. cruzi amastigotes > 200). Representative compounds of different chemical classes were included. A fast luminescence assay with transgenic parasites that express luciferase, and live imaging techniques were used. A total of 11 out of 13 compounds demonstrated significant antichagasic activity when administered intraperitoneally for 5-10 days at relatively small doses. The best in vivo activity was demonstrated by amides and sulfonamide derivatives. ADMET studies were performed for specific compounds.

conclusionAt least three compounds were identified as effective, non-toxic antichagasic agents suitable for further development.

Indexed as

AmidesAnimalsCaco-2 CellsCell LineCell Membrane PermeabilityChagas DiseaseEmbryo, NonmammalianHumansOrganisms, Genetically ModifiedParasitic Sensitivity TestsRatsStructure-Activity RelationshipSulfonamidesTriazolesTrypanocidal AgentsTrypanosoma cruzi1,2,4-triazoleAmidesSulfonamidesTriazolesTrypanocidal Agents

Identifiers

PMID24144412
PMCPMC3948331
OpenAlexW2021723821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.