ReviewClinical endoscopy2013
Pancreatic fluid collection drainage by endoscopic ultrasound: an update.
Review in Clinical endoscopy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic ultrasound drainage for the management of fluid collections after pancreas surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Pooled it
- Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Endoscopic Management of Peripancreatic Fluid Collections.Gut and liver · 2021Guideline
- Endoscopic management of complications of acute pancreatitis: an update on the field.Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2018Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents in Management of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: Are They Better Than Plastic Stents? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2018Pooled it
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatments: are we getting evidence based--a systematic review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Pooled it
- Article
- Article
- Endoscopic transgastric fenestration versus percutaneous drainage for management of (peri)pancreatic fluid collections adjacent to gastric wall (with video).World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Endoscopic Management of Peripancreatic Fluid Collections.Clinical endoscopy · 2021Review
- Endosonography-guided transmural drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: comparative outcomes by stent type.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Article
- Outcomes of a single-step endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic-fluid collections using an electrocautery-enhanced coaxial lumen-apposing, self-expanding metal stent with and without fluoroscopy.Gastroenterology report · 2020Article
- Advancements in the endoscopic treatment of pancreatic fluid collections.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2020Review
- Multivariate analysis of the factors affecting the prognosis of walled-off pancreatic necrosis after endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Are Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents More Effective Than Plastic Stents for the Management of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2020Review
- Stent migration following treatment of pancreatic pseudocyst by cyst gastrostomy.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2019Article
- Spontaneous Closure of a Large Transmural Gastric Defect After Removal of a Migrated AXIOS Stent.ACG case reports journal · 2019Article
- Observational
- Novel lumen-apposing metal stent for the drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: An Italian multicentre experience.United European gastroenterology journal · 2018Article
- Algorithm for the multidisciplinary management of hemorrhage in EUS-guided drainage for pancreatic fluid collections.World journal of clinical cases · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic management of symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) is now considered to be first line therapy. Expanded use of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) techniques has resulted in increased applicability, safety, and efficacy of endoscopic transluminal PFC drainage. Steps include EUS-guided trangastric or transduodenal fistula creation into the PFC followed by stent placement or nasocystic drain deployment in order to decompress the collection. With the remarkable improvement in the available accessories and stents and development of exchange free access device; EUS drainage techniques have become simpler and less time consuming. The use of self-expandable metal stents with modifications to drain PFC has helped in overcoming some previously encountered challenges. PFCs considered suitable for endoscopic drainage include collection present for greater than 4 weeks, possessing a well-formed wall, position accessible endoscopically and located within 1 cm of the duodenal or gastric walls. Indications for EUS-guided drainage have been increasing which include unusual location of the collection, small window of entry, nonbulging collections, coagulopathy, intervening varices, failed conventional transmural drainage, indeterminate adherence of PFC to the luminal wall or suspicion of malignancy. In this article, we present a review of literature to date and discuss the recent developments in EUS-guided PFC drainage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.