GuidelineOntario health technology assessment series2013
Optimizing chronic disease management in the community (outpatient) setting (OCDM): an evidentiary framework.
Guideline in Ontario health technology assessment series, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Identification of Key Genes and Biological Pathways in Heart Failure by Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021Article
- Technology-assisted congestive heart failure care.Current heart failure reports · 2015Review
- Health Care for People Approaching the End of Life: An Evidentiary Framework.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2014Article
- Health technologies for the improvement of chronic disease management: a review of the Medical Advisory Secretariat evidence-based analyses between 2006 and 2011.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2013Review
- Addressing Physical Activity Behavior in Multiple Sclerosis Management: A Qualitative Account of Health Care Providers' Current Practices and Perspectives.International journal of MS careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24143159PMC3799266What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.