ReviewPatient preference and adherence2013
Should treatment for depression be based more on patient preference?
Review in Patient preference and adherence, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting Medication Nonadherence in Older Adults With Difficult-to-Treat Depression in the IRL-GRey Randomized Controlled Trial.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2022Trial
- Personalising psychotherapies for depression using a novel mixed methods approach: an example from Morita therapy.Trials · 2020Trial
- Treatment credibility, expectancy, and preference: Prediction of treatment engagement and outcome in a randomized clinical trial of hatha yoga vs. health education as adjunct treatments for depression.Journal of affective disorders · 2018Trial
- Effects of Patient Preferences on Outcomes in the Predictors of Remission in Depression to Individual and Combined Treatments (PReDICT) Study.The American journal of psychiatry · 2017Trial
- Trial
- Confirmation bias in web-based search: a randomized online study on the effects of expert information and social tags on information search and evaluation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2014Trial
- Utilization of psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, and their combination by individuals with current or residual depression: results from five annual nationally representative German surveys.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring Patient Empowerment in Major Depressive Disorder: Correlations of Trust, Active Role in Shared Decision-Making, and Symptomatology in a Sample of Italian Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Mental health services for German university students: acceptance of intervention targets and preference for delivery modes.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
- Specifying the Efficacy of Digital Therapeutic Tools for Depression and Anxiety: Retrospective, 2-Cohort, Real-World Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Are Veterans Getting Their Preferred Depression Treatment? A National Observational Study in the Veterans Health Administration.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Observational
- Prevalence, progress, and subgroup disparities in pharmacological antidepressant treatment of those who screen positive for depressive symptoms: A repetitive cross-sectional study in 19 European countries.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2022Article
- Assessing the Care Modality Preferences and Predictors for Digital Mental Health Treatment Seekers in a Technology-Enabled Stepped Care Delivery System: Cross-sectional Study.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- Psychometric evaluation of a decision quality instrument for medication decisions for treatment of depression symptoms.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Understanding Treatment Preferences of Australian Patients Living with Treatment-Resistant Depression.Patient preference and adherence · 2021Article
- Illness narratives and preferences for treatment among older veterans living with treatment-resistant depression and insomnia.Annals of clinical psychiatry : official journal of the American Academy of Clinical Psychiatrists · 2020Article
- The (cost) effectiveness of guided internet-based self-help CBT for dialysis patients with symptoms of depression: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.BMC psychiatry · 2019Article
- [Attitudes towards depression and treatment options in patients with coronary heart disease].Der Nervenarzt · 2019Article
- Article
- Evidence-Based Applications of Combination Psychotherapy and Pharmacotherapy for Depression.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient treatment preferences are of growing interest to researchers, clinicians, and patients. In this review, an overview of the most commonly recommended treatments for depression is provided, along with a brief review of the evidence supporting their efficacy. Studies examining the effect of patient treatment preferences on treatment course and outcome are summarized. Existing literature on what treatment options patients tend to prefer and believe to be helpful, and what factors may affect these preferences, is also reviewed. Finally, clinical implications of research findings on patient preferences for depression management are discussed. In summary, although our knowledge of the impact of patient preferences on treatment course and outcome is limited, knowing and considering those preferences may be clinically important and worthy of greater study for evidence-based practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.