Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24142997›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2014

Next-generation sequencing-based multigene mutational screening for acute myeloid leukemia using MiSeq: applicability for diagnostics and disease monitoring.

Rajyalakshmi Luthra, Keyur P Patel, Neelima G Reddy, Varan Haghshenas, Mark J Routbort, Michael A Harmon, Bedia A Barkoh, Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna, Farhad Ravandi, Jorge E Cortes and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 182 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Azacitidine, Venetoclax, and Magrolimab in Newly Diagnosed and Relapsed Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Phase Ib/II Study and Correlative Analysis.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Azacitidine, Venetoclax, and Gilteritinib in Newly Diagnosed and Relapsed or RefractoryJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rajyalakshmi Luthrarluthra@mdanderson.org or rsingh@mdanderson.org.
Keyur P Patel
Neelima G Reddy
Varan Haghshenas
Mark J Routbort
Michael A Harmon
Bedia A Barkoh
Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna
Farhad Ravandi
Jorge E Cortes
Hagop M Kantarjian
L Jeffrey Medeiros
Rajesh R Singh
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Routine molecular testing in acute myeloid leukemia involves screening several genes of therapeutic and prognostic significance for mutations. A comprehensive analysis using single-gene assays requires large amounts of DNA, is cumbersome and timely consolidation of results for clinical reporting is challenging. High throughput, next-generation sequencing platforms widely used in research have not been tested vigorously for clinical application. Here we describe the clinical application of MiSeq, a next-generation sequencing platform to screen mutational hotspots in 54 cancer-related genes including genes relevant in acute myeloid leukemia (NRAS, KRAS, FLT3, NPM1, DNMT3A, IDH1/2, JAK2, KIT and EZH2). We sequenced 63 samples from patients with acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome using MiSeq and compared the results with those obtained using another next-generation sequencing platform, Ion-Torrent Personal Genome Machine and other conventional testing platforms. MiSeq detected a total of 100 single nucleotide variants and 23 NPM1 insertions that were confirmed by Ion Torrent or conventional platforms, indicating complete concordance. FLT3-internal tandem duplications (n=10) were not detected; however, re-analysis of the MiSeq output by Pindel, an indel detection algorithm, did detect them. Dilution studies of cancer cell-line DNA showed that the quantitative accuracy of mutation detection was up to an allelic frequency of 1.5% with a high level of inter- and intra-run assay reproducibility, suggesting potential utility for monitoring response to therapy, clonal heterogeneity and evolution. Examples demonstrating the advantages of MiSeq over conventional platforms for disease monitoring are provided. Easy work-flow, high throughput multiplexing capability, 4-day turnaround time and simultaneous assessment of routinely tested and emerging markers make MiSeq highly applicable for clinical molecular testing in acute myeloid leukemia.

Indexed as

MutationDNA Mutational AnalysisHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteNeoplasm, ResidualNucleophosminReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityNucleophosmin

Identifiers

PMID24142997
PMCPMC3943309
OpenAlexW2053968609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.