Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24142921›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2013

Identification and characterization of FGF2-dependent mRNA: microRNA networks during lens fiber cell differentiation.

Louise Wolf, Chun S Gao, Karen Gueta, Qing Xie, Tiphaine Chevallier, Nikhil R Podduturi, Jian Sun, Ivan Conte, Peggy S Zelenka, Ruth Ashery-Padan and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Louise WolfDepartment of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461.
Chun S Gao
Karen Gueta
Qing Xie
Tiphaine Chevallier
Nikhil R Podduturi
Jian Sun
Ivan Conte
Peggy S Zelenka
Ruth Ashery-Padan
Jiri Zavadil
Ales Cvekl
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USNational Eye Institute · USTel Aviv University · ILNYU Langone Health · USTelethon Institute Of Genetics And Medicine · IT

Funding

Vaccine FacilityP30CA016087 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ANIRBAN MAITRA · 1985 to 2026
$83.1M
Transcriptional Control of the Mouse aA-crystallin locusR01EY014237 · NEI · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI Ales Cvekl · 2003 to 2026
$11.0M
Signal transduction in Epithelial Cells of the Lens and CorneaZ01EY000238 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI ZELENKA, PEGGY S · 1986 to 2008
$4.8M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 EY000238NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016087NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016087-30NEI NIH HHS EY014237-7S1NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014237NEI NIH HHS Z01-EY000238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling regulate a wide range of cellular functions, including cell specification, proliferation, migration, differentiation, and survival. In lens, both these systems control lens fiber cell differentiation; however, a possible link between these processes remains to be examined. Herein, the functional requirement for miRNAs in differentiating lens fiber cells was demonstrated via conditional inactivation of Dicer1 in mouse (Mus musculus) lens. To dissect the miRNA-dependent pathways during lens differentiation, we used a rat (Rattus norvegicus) lens epithelial explant system, induced by FGF2 to differentiate, followed by mRNA and miRNA expression profiling. Transcriptome and miRNome analysis identified extensive FGF2-regulated cellular responses that were both independent and dependent on miRNAs. We identified 131 FGF2-regulated miRNAs. Seventy-six of these miRNAs had at least two in silico predicted and inversely regulated target mRNAs. Genes modulated by the greatest number of FGF-regulated miRNAs include DNA-binding transcription factors Nfib, Nfat5/OREBP, c-Maf, Ets1, and N-Myc. Activated FGF signaling influenced bone morphogenetic factor/transforming growth factor-β, Notch, and Wnt signaling cascades implicated earlier in lens differentiation. Specific miRNA:mRNA interaction networks were predicted for c-Maf, N-Myc, and Nfib (DNA-binding transcription factors); Cnot6, Cpsf6, Dicer1, and Tnrc6b (RNA to miRNA processing); and Ash1l, Med1/PBP, and Kdm5b/Jarid1b/Plu1 (chromatin remodeling). Three miRNAs, including miR-143, miR-155, and miR-301a, down-regulated expression of c-Maf in the 3'-UTR luciferase reporter assays. These present studies demonstrate for the first time global impact of activated FGF signaling in lens cell culture system and predicted novel gene regulatory networks connected by multiple miRNAs that regulate lens differentiation.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Cycle CheckpointsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedDEAD-box RNA HelicasesFemaleFibroblast Growth Factor 2Gene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksIn Vitro TechniquesLens, CrystallineMiceMice, Mutant StrainsMicroRNAsPregnancyRatsDEAD-box RNA HelicasesDicer1 protein, mouseFibroblast Growth Factor 2MicroRNAsRibonuclease IIIRNA, Messengerc-MafDicer1differentiationFGF2lensmicroRNAssignaling

Identifiers

PMID24142921
PMCPMC3852386
OpenAlexW2166912222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.