Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24142473›Full record

Trial reportDrugs in R&D2013

The safety of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6 % used three times daily for 7 days in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis.

Ranjan Malhotra, Stacey Ackerman, Lynne S Gearinger, Timothy W Morris, Catherine Allaire

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drugs in R&D, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antibiotics versus placebo for acute bacterial conjunctivitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ranjan MalhotraOphthalmology Associates, Cornea and Laser Vision Institute, 12990 Manchester Road, Suite 200, St. Louis, MO, 63131, USA, ranjan.malhotra@youreyedoc.com.
Stacey Ackerman
Lynne S Gearinger
Timothy W Morris
Catherine Allaire
Bausch & Lomb (France) · FRInstitut de la Vision · FROphthalmology Associates (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBesifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6 % (Besivance(®); Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY, USA) was approved by the FDA in 2009 for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis, with a recommended 7-day dosing regimen.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to compare the safety of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6 %, administered three times a day for 7 days, with that of its vehicle.

methodsThis randomized, multicenter, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group study involved 518 patients ≥1 year of age with a clinical diagnosis of bacterial conjunctivitis. Patients were randomized 2:1 to treatment with besifloxacin 0.6 % ophthalmic suspension or vehicle, one drop in the infected eye(s) TID for 7 days. Main outcomes included the incidence and types of adverse events reported by the subject or observed by the investigator at each study visit.

resultsThirty-one ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 28 subjects in the study eye; 19 occurred in 17/344 (4.9 %) besifloxacin patients, and 12 occurred in 11/170 (6.5 %) vehicle patients (p = 0.5362). Only two ocular events (mild instillation site reaction, one case in each group) were considered "definitely related" to study treatment. One event of self-limited dysgeusia in the besifloxacin group was considered definitely related to treatment; there were no other nonocular TEAEs considered related to treatment. There were no serious adverse events, and other safety outcomes (visual acuity, biomicroscopy, ophthalmoscopy) were unremarkable.

conclusionThese findings indicate that besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6 % is safe in patients aged 1 year and older when used TID for 7 days.

Indexed as

Administration, OphthalmicAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzepinesChildChild, PreschoolConjunctivitis, BacterialDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFluoroquinolonesHumansInfantMaleAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzepinesbesifloxacinFluoroquinolonesSuspensions

Identifiers

PMID24142473
PMCPMC3851703
OpenAlexW2082527026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.