Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24142420›Full record

ArticleMuscle & nerve2014

Myotonic Dystrophy Health Index: initial evaluation of a disease-specific outcome measure.

Chad Heatwole, Rita Bode, Nicholas Johnson, Jeanne Dekdebrun, Nuran Dilek, Mark Heatwole, James E Hilbert, Elizabeth Luebbe, William Martens, Michael P Mcdermott and 5 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Muscle & nerve, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Analysis of the functional capacity outcome measures for myotonic dystrophy.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Chad HeatwoleThe University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Neurology, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 673, Rochester, New York, 14642, USA.
Rita Bode
Nicholas Johnson
Jeanne Dekdebrun
Nuran Dilek
Mark Heatwole
James E Hilbert
Elizabeth Luebbe
William Martens
Michael P Mcdermott
Nan Rothrock
Charles Thornton
Barbara G Vickrey
David Victorson
Richard Moxley

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER'S RESEARCH ASSOCIATE ORGANIZATIONUL1RR024160 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI PEARSON, THOMAS ARTHUR · 2006 to 2011
$38.7M
Training and Educational CoreU54NS048843 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI THORNTON, CHARLES A · 2003 to 2017
$21.9M
The Development and Use of a Disease-Specific Instrument for Myotonic DystophyK23AR055947 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HEATWOLE, CHAD RYDEL · 2008 to 2012
$648k
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024160NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR024160NIAMS NIH HHS 1K23AR055947NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR055947NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS048843NINDS NIH HHS U54NS48843
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn preparation for clinical trials we examine the validity, reliability, and patient understanding of the Myotonic Dystrophy Health Index (MDHI).

methodsInitially we partnered with 278 myotonic dystrophy type-1 (DM1) patients and identified the most relevant questions for the MDHI. Next, we used factor analysis, patient interviews, and test-retest reliability assessments to refine and evaluate the instrument. Lastly, we determined the capability of the MDHI to differentiate between known groups of DM1 participants.

resultsQuestions in the final MDHI represent 17 areas of DM1 health. The internal consistency was acceptable in all subscales. The MDHI had a high test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.95) and differentiated between DM1 patient groups with different disease severities.

conclusionsInitial evaluation of the MDHI provides evidence that it is valid and reliable as an outcome measure for assessing patient-reported health. These results suggest that important aspects of DM1 health may be measured effectively using the MDHI.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationPatient Outcome AssessmentSeverity of Illness IndexAdultAgedCost of IllnessFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyotonic DystrophyOutcome Assessment, Health CareReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesmuscle diseasemyotonic dystrophy type-1patient-relevantpatient-reported outcome measuretherapeutic trial, quality of life

Identifiers

PMID24142420
PMCPMC5551891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.