Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24142410›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2014

Neural correlates of successful semantic processing during propofol sedation.

Ram M Adapa, Matthew H Davis, Emmanuel A Stamatakis, Anthony R Absalom, David K Menon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Residual Language Learning Ability in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Dopaminergic brainstem disconnection is common to pharmacological and pathological consciousness perturbation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ram M AdapaDivision of Anesthesia, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
Matthew H Davis
Emmanuel A Stamatakis
Anthony R Absalom
David K Menon
University of Cambridge · GBMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0001354Medical Research Council G1000183Medical Research Council MC_U105580446Medical Research Council MC_US_A060_0038Wellcome Trust 083660/Z/07/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sedation has a graded effect on brain responses to auditory stimuli: perceptual processing persists at sedation levels that attenuate more complex processing. We used fMRI in healthy volunteers sedated with propofol to assess changes in neural responses to spoken stimuli. Volunteers were scanned awake, sedated, and during recovery, while making perceptual or semantic decisions about nonspeech sounds or spoken words respectively. Sedation caused increased error rates and response times, and differentially affected responses to words in the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) and the left inferior temporal gyrus (LITG). Activity in LIFG regions putatively associated with semantic processing, was significantly reduced by sedation despite sedated volunteers continuing to make accurate semantic decisions. Instead, LITG activity was preserved for words greater than nonspeech sounds and may therefore be associated with persistent semantic processing during the deepest levels of sedation. These results suggest functionally distinct contributions of frontal and temporal regions to semantic decision making. These results have implications for functional imaging studies of language, for understanding mechanisms of impaired speech comprehension in postoperative patients with residual levels of anesthetic, and may contribute to the development of frameworks against which EEG based monitors could be calibrated to detect awareness under anesthesia.

Indexed as

Brain MappingSemanticsAcoustic StimulationAdultAnalysis of VarianceBrainDecision MakingFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedOxygenPropofolHypnotics and SedativesOxygenPropofolfunctional MRIinferior frontal gyruspropofolsedationsemantic processing

Identifiers

PMID24142410
PMCPMC6869007
OpenAlexW2124964445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.