Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24142369›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2014

Psychosis prediction: stratification of risk estimation with information-processing and premorbid functioning variables.

Dorien H Nieman, Stephan Ruhrmann, Sara Dragt, Francesca Soen, Mirjam J van Tricht, Johannes H T M Koelman, Lo J Bour, Eva Velthorst, Hiske E Becker, Mark Weiser and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Familial and socioeconomic contributions to premorbid functioning in psychosis: Impact on age at onset and treatment response.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Dorien H NiemanDepartment of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Joint first authorship. d.h.nieman@amc.uva.nl.
Stephan RuhrmannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Joint first authorship.
Sara DragtDepartment of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands;
Francesca SoenDepartment of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands;
Mirjam J van TrichtDepartment of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands;
Johannes H T M KoelmanDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands;
Lo J BourDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands;
Eva VelthorstDepartment of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands;
Hiske E BeckerDepartment of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands;
Mark WeiserDepartment of Psychiatry, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Don H LinszenDepartment of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands;
Lieuwe de HaanDepartment of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands;

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe period preceding the first psychotic episode is regarded as a promising period for intervention. We aimed to develop an optimized prediction model of a first psychosis, considering different sources of information. The outcome of this model may be used for individualized risk estimation.

methodsSixty-one subjects clinically at high risk (CHR), participating in the Dutch Prediction of Psychosis Study, were assessed at baseline with instruments yielding data on neuropsychology, symptomatology, environmental factors, premorbid adjustment, and neurophysiology. The follow-up period was 36 months.

resultsAt 36 months, 18 participants (29.5%) had made a transition to psychosis. Premorbid adjustment (P = .001, hazard ratio [HR] = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.39/3.28) and parietal P300 amplitude (P = .004, HR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.08/1.45) remained as predictors in the Cox proportional hazard model. The resulting prognostic score (PS) showed a sensitivity of 88.9% and a specificity of 82.5%. The area under the curve of the PS was 0.91 (95% CI = 0.83-0.98, cross-validation: 0.86), indicating an outstanding ability of the model to discriminate between transition and nontransition. The PS was further stratified into 3 risk classes establishing a prognostic index. In the class with the worst social-personal adjustment and lowest P300 amplitudes, 74% of the subjects made a transition to psychosis. Furthermore, transition emerged on average more than 17 months earlier than in the lowest risk class.

conclusionsOur results suggest that predicting a first psychotic episode in CHR subjects could be improved with a model including premorbid adjustment and information-processing variables in a multistep algorithm combining risk detection and stratification.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionSocial AdjustmentAdolescentAdultChildEvent-Related Potentials, P300FemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleProdromal SymptomsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsPsychotic DisordersRisk AssessmentSensitivity and Specificityclinical high riskP300 event-related potentialpremorbid adjustmentprognostic indexpsychosis prediction

Identifiers

PMID24142369
PMCPMC4193687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.