Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24141784›Full record

ArticleOncogene2014

Context-dependent adaption of EpCAM expression in early systemic esophageal cancer.

C Driemel, H Kremling, S Schumacher, D Will, J Wolters, N Lindenlauf, B Mack, S A Baldus, V Hoya, J M Pietsch and 8 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

C DriemelDepartment for General, Visceral und Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
H KremlingDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Grosshadern Medical Center, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
S SchumacherDepartment for General, Visceral und Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
D WillDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Grosshadern Medical Center, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
J WoltersDepartment for General, Visceral und Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
N LindenlaufDepartment for General, Visceral und Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
B MackDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Grosshadern Medical Center, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
S A BaldusInstitute for Pathology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
V HoyaDepartment for General, Visceral und Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
J M PietschDepartment for General, Visceral und Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
P PanagiotidouDepartment for General, Visceral und Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
K RabaInstitute for Transplantation Diagnostics and Cellular Therapy, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
C VayDepartment for General, Visceral und Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
D VallböhmerDepartment for General, Visceral und Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
U HarréusDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Grosshadern Medical Center, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
W T KnoefelDepartment for General, Visceral und Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
N H StoeckleinDepartment for General, Visceral und Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
O GiresDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Grosshadern Medical Center, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of the epithelial cell adhesion molecule EpCAM in cancer progression remains largely unclear. High expression of EpCAM in primary tumors is often associated with more aggressive phenotypes and EpCAM is the prime epithelial antigen in use to isolate circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and characterize disseminated tumor cells (DTCs). However, reduced expression of EpCAM was associated with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and reports on a lack of EpCAM on CTCs emerged. These contradictory observations might reflect a context-dependent adaption of EpCAM expression during metastatic progression. To test this, EpCAM expression was monitored in esophageal cancer at different sites of early systemic disease. Although most of the primary esophageal tumors expressed high levels of EpCAM, the majority of DTCs in bone marrow lacked EpCAM. In vitro, downregulation of EpCAM expression at the plasma membrane was observed in migrating and invading cells, and was associated with a partial loss of the epithelial phenotype and with significantly decreased proliferation. Accordingly, induction of EMT through the action of TGFβ resulted in substantial loss of EpCAM cell surface expression on esophageal cancer cells. Knock-down or natural loss of EpCAM recapitulated these effects as it reduced proliferation while enhancing migration and invasion of cancer cells. Importantly, expression of EpCAM on DTCs was significantly associated with the occurrence of lymph node metastases and with significantly decreased overall survival of esophageal cancer patients. We validated this observation by showing that high expression of EpCAM promoted tumor outgrowth after xenotransplantation of esophageal carcinoma cells. The present data disclose a dynamic expression of EpCAM throughout tumor progression, where EpCAM(high) phenotypes correlate with proliferative stages, whereas EpCAM(low/negative) phenotypes associated with migration, invasion and dissemination. Thus, differing expression levels of EpCAM must be taken into consideration for therapeutic approaches and during clinical retrieval of disseminated tumor cells.

Indexed as

AgedAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmCell Adhesion MoleculesCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionEsophageal NeoplasmsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHeterograftsHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiceAntigens, NeoplasmCell Adhesion MoleculesEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeTransforming Growth Factor beta

Identifiers

PMID24141784
OpenAlexW2009693910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.