Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24141109›Full record

ArticleStem cell research2014

Hydrogel formulation determines cell fate of fetal and adult neural progenitor cells.

Emily R Aurand, Jennifer L Wagner, Robin Shandas, Kimberly B Bjugstad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Advances in currentFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Hydrogel systems and their role in neural tissue engineering.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Engineered 3D Silk-collagen-based Model of Polarized Neural Tissue.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily R AurandNeuroscience Program, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Mail Stop 8313, 12800 E. 19th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. Electronic address: Emily.Aurand@ucdenver.edu.
Jennifer L WagnerDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Mail Stop 8607, 12700 E. 19th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. Electronic address: Jennifer.Wagner@ucdenver.edu.
Robin ShandasDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Mail Stop 8607, 12700 E. 19th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. Electronic address: Robin.Shandas@ucdenver.edu.
Kimberly B BjugstadNeuroscience Program, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Mail Stop 8313, 12800 E. 19th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Mail Stop 8313, 12800 E. 19th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. Electronic address: Kimberly.Bjugstad@ucdenver.edu.

Funding

Cardiovascular Biomechanics and Imaging in Down SyndromeT32HL072738 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SHANDAS, ROBIN · 2003 to 2025
$4.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL072738
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrogels provide a unique tool for neural tissue engineering. These materials can be customized for certain functions, i.e. to provide cell/drug delivery or act as a physical scaffold. Unfortunately, hydrogel complexities can negatively impact their biocompatibility, resulting in unintended consequences. These adverse effects may be combated with a better understanding of hydrogel chemical, physical, and mechanical properties, and how these properties affect encapsulated neural cells. We defined the polymerization and degradation rates and compressive moduli of 25 hydrogels formulated from different concentrations of hyaluronic acid (HA) and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG). Changes in compressive modulus were driven primarily by the HA concentration. The in vitro biocompatibility of fetal-derived (fNPC) and adult-derived (aNPC) neural progenitor cells was dependent on hydrogel formulation. Acute survival of fNPC benefited from hydrogel encapsulation. NPC differentiation was divergent: fNPC differentiated into mostly glial cells, compared with neuronal differentiation of aNPC. Differentiation was influenced in part by the hydrogel mechanical properties. This study indicates that there can be a wide range of HA and PEG hydrogels compatible with NPC. Additionally, this is the first study comparing hydrogel encapsulation of NPC derived from different aged sources, with data suggesting that fNPC and aNPC respond dissimilarly within the same hydrogel formulation.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedCell SurvivalElastic ModulusFemaleHyaluronic AcidHydrogelsMiceNeural Stem CellsPolyethylene GlycolsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTime FactorsHyaluronic AcidHydrogelsPolyethylene Glycols

Identifiers

PMID24141109
PMCPMC4687407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.