ArticlePM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation2014
Instrumental activities of daily living staging as a possible clinical tool for falls risk assessment in physical medicine and rehabilitation.
Article in PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Functional continuum stratifies fall risk in older adults.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Body pain and functional disability predict falls in Chinese older adults: a population-based cohort study.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2022Article
- The Association Between Activity Limitation Stages and Admission to Facilities Providing Long-term Care Among Older Medicare Beneficiaries.American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation · 2017Article
- Strategies to reduce the risk of falling: Cohort study analysis with 1-year follow-up in community dwelling older adults.BMC geriatrics · 2016Article
- Understanding non-performance reports for instrumental activity of daily living items in population analyses: a cross sectional study.BMC geriatrics · 2016Article
- Disability Stage is an Independent Risk Factor for Mortality in Medicare Beneficiaries Aged 65 Years and Older.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2015Article
- Activity Limitation Stages empirically derived for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental ADL in the U.S. Adult community-dwelling Medicare population.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2014Article
- The 1994-1995 National Health Interview Survey on Disability (NHIS-D): A Bibliography of 20 Years of Research.Review of disability studiesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine whether instrumental activity of daily living (IADL) limitation stages can distinguish among elderly, community-dwelling persons with high likelihoods to have fallen once and more than once.
designA cross-sectional survey.
settingA nationally representative sample from the Second Longitudinal Study of Aging (LSOA II).
participantsIncluded were 7401 community-dwelling persons 70 years of age and older.
methodsThe association of falling once and more than once within the past 12 months and 5 stages of increasing IADL limitation were explored by using a multinomial logistic regression model that controlled for demographics, education, perceived lack of home accessibility features, and health conditions. Sample proportions were weighted to reflect the prevalence in the U.S. population of 1994. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Subject recall of fall history. There were 3 categories for this variable: no fall, falling once, and falling more than once in the past 12 months.
resultsCompared with IADL stage 0, the adjusted relative risk ratio of falling once peaked in individuals at IADL stage II at 2.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-2.6), and those at IADL stage III had a relative risk ratio of 1.8 (95% CI, 1.3-2.6). The relative risk ratio of falling more than once was 2.1 (95% CI, 1.7-2.6), 4.0 (95% CI, 3.0-5.3), 3.7 (95% CI, 2.8-5.0), and 2.7 (95% CI, 1.5-4.9) for IADL stages I, II, III, and IV, respectively, when treating IADL stage 0 as reference.
conclusionsIADL limitation stages could represent a powerful and practical tool for screening patients in the U.S. elderly population according to fall risk. Clinical implementation and prospective testing for validation as a screening tool would be necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.