ReviewFunctional neurology
The connectomics challenge.
Review in Functional neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of Neural Diameter From Morphology to Enable Accurate Simulation.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2021Article
- Whole-Brain Microscopy Meets In Vivo Neuroimaging: Techniques, Benefits, and Limitations.Molecular imaging and biology · 2017Review
- Differential involvement of cortical and cerebellar areas using dominant and nondominant hands: An FMRI study.Human brain mapping · 2015Article
- Visible rodent brain-wide networks at single-neuron resolution.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2015Review
- About connections.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2015Review
- Article
- Realistic modeling of neurons and networks: towards brain simulation.Functional neurologyReview
- Chronobiological correlates of headache: three decades on.Functional neurologyArticle
- Brain investigation and brain conceptualization.Functional neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the most fascinating challenges in neuroscience is the reconstruction of the connectivity map of the brain. Recent years have seen a rapid expansion in the field of connectomics, whose aim is to trace this map and understand its relationship with neural computation. Many different approaches, ranging from electron and optical microscopy to magnetic resonance imaging, have been proposed to address the connectomics challenge on various spatial scales and in different species. Here, we review the main technological advances in the microscopy techniques applied to connectomics, highlighting the potential and limitations of the different methods. Finally, we briefly discuss the role of connectomics in the Human Brain Project, the Future and Emerging Technologies (FET) Flagship recently approved by the European Commission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24139653PMC3812743What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.