Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24139652›Full record

ReviewFunctional neurology

Realistic modeling of neurons and networks: towards brain simulation.

Egidio D'Angelo, Sergio Solinas, Jesus Garrido, Claudia Casellato, Alessandra Pedrocchi, Jonathan Mapelli, Daniela Gandolfi, Francesca Prestori

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Functional neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Large-Scale Mechanistic Models of Brain Circuits with Biophysically and Morphologically Detailed Neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The brainstem connectome database.Scientific data · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Egidio D'Angelo
Sergio Solinas
Jesus Garrido
Claudia Casellato
Alessandra Pedrocchi
Jonathan Mapelli
Daniela Gandolfi
Francesca Prestori

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Realistic modeling is a new advanced methodology for investigating brain functions. Realistic modeling is based on a detailed biophysical description of neurons and synapses, which can be integrated into microcircuits. The latter can, in turn, be further integrated to form large-scale brain networks and eventually to reconstruct complex brain systems. Here we provide a review of the realistic simulation strategy and use the cerebellar network as an example. This network has been carefully investigated at molecular and cellular level and has been the object of intense theoretical investigation. The cerebellum is thought to lie at the core of the forward controller operations of the brain and to implement timing and sensory prediction functions. The cerebellum is well described and provides a challenging field in which one of the most advanced realistic microcircuit models has been generated. We illustrate how these models can be elaborated and embedded into robotic control systems to gain insight into how the cellular properties of cerebellar neurons emerge in integrated behaviors. Realistic network modeling opens up new perspectives for the investigation of brain pathologies and for the neurorobotic field.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsAnimalsBrainComputer SimulationElectric StimulationHumansNerve NetNeurons

Identifiers

PMID24139652
PMCPMC3812748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.