ReviewFunctional neurology
Seven challenges for neuroscience.
Review in Functional neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Meta-Research in Neuroscience: An Urgent Call to Strengthen the Reliability and Translation of Knowledge into Evidence-Based Neurological Practice.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- WhenAPL bioengineering · 2025Review
- Creating a Pipeline of Talent to Feed the Growth of Neuroscience: Lessons From Ghana.Neurology. Education · 2025Review
- Editorial: Women pioneering neuroinformatics and neuroscience-related machine learning, 2024.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2025Article
- Review of the Brain's Behaviour after Injury and Disease for Its Application in an Agent-Based Model (ABM).Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- Functional Connectivity Biomarkers in Schizophrenia.Advances in neurobiology · 2024Review
- Article
- Convergence of Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience towards the Diagnosis of Neurological Disorders-A Scoping Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Neuroscience Knowledge and Endorsement of Neuromyths among Educators: What Is the Scenario in Brazil?Brain sciences · 2022Article
- What Does the General Public Know (or Not) About Neuroscience? Effects of Age, Region and Profession in Brazil.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Three dimensional microelectrodes enable high signal and spatial resolution for neural seizure recordings in brain slices and freely behaving animals.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- An Adaptive Blended Learning Model for the Implementation of an Integrated Medical Neuroscience Course During the Covid-19 Pandemic.Anatomical sciences education · 2021Article
- Enhancing the Effects of Neurofeedback Training: The Motivational Value of the Reinforcers.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Article
- Bibliometric analysis of Neurosciences research productivity in Saudi Arabia from 2013-2018.Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) · 2020Article
- LORETA With Cortical Constraint: Choosing an Adequate Surface Laplacian Operator.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
- Complex Dynamics in Simplified Neuronal Models: Reproducing Golgi Cell Electroresponsiveness.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2018Article
- Large-Scale Brain Simulation and Disorders of Consciousness. Mapping Technical and Conceptual Issues.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Morphological Neuron Classification Using Machine Learning.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although twenty-first century neuroscience is a major scientific enterprise, advances in basic research have not yet translated into benefits for society. In this paper, I outline seven fundamental challenges that need to be overcome. First, neuroscience has to become "big science" - we need big teams with the resources and competences to tackle the big problems. Second, we need to create interlinked sets of data providing a complete picture of single areas of the brain at their different levels of organization with "rungs" linking the descriptions for humans and other species. Such "data ladders" will help us to meet the third challenge - the development of efficient predictive tools, enabling us to drastically increase the information we can extract from expensive experiments. The fourth challenge goes one step further: we have to develop novel hardware and software sufficiently powerful to simulate the brain. In the future, supercomputer-based brain simulation will enable us to make in silico manipulations and recordings, which are currently completely impossible in the lab. The fifth and sixth challenges are translational. On the one hand we need to develop new ways of classifying and simulating brain disease, leading to better diagnosis and more effective drug discovery. On the other, we have to exploit our knowledge to build new brain-inspired technologies, with potentially huge benefits for industry and for society. This leads to the seventh challenge. Neuroscience can indeed deliver huge benefits but we have to be aware of widespread social concern about our work. We need to recognize the fears that exist, lay them to rest, and actively build public support for neuroscience research. We have to set goals for ourselves that the public can recognize and share. And then we have to deliver on our promises. Only in this way, will we receive the support and funding we need.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24139651PMC3812747What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.