Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24139482›Full record

ArticleBMC biotechnology2013

Accuracy and efficiency define Bxb1 integrase as the best of fifteen candidate serine recombinases for the integration of DNA into the human genome.

Zhengyao Xu, Louise Thomas, Ben Davies, Ronald Chalmers, Maggie Smith, William Brown

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biotechnology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Gene-sized editing for the therapy of genetic diseases.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mitigating genetic instability caused by the excision activity of theApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Zhengyao Xu
Louise Thomas
Ben Davies
Ronald Chalmers
Maggie Smith
William BrownQueens Medical Centre, School of Life Sciences, Nottingham University, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK. william.brown@nottingham.ac.uk.
Queen's Medical Centre · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H005277/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H005447/1Wellcome Trust 090532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhage-encoded serine integrases, such as φC31 integrase, are widely used for genome engineering. Fifteen such integrases have been described but their utility for genome engineering has not been compared in uniform assays.

resultsWe have compared fifteen serine integrases for their utility for DNA manipulations in mammalian cells after first demonstrating that all were functional in E. coli. Chromosomal recombination reporters were used to show that seven integrases were active on chromosomally integrated DNA in human fibroblasts and mouse embryonic stem cells. Five of the remaining eight enzymes were active on extra-chromosomal substrates thereby demonstrating that the ability to mediate extra-chromosomal recombination is no guide to ability to mediate site-specific recombination on integrated DNA. All the integrases that were active on integrated DNA also promoted DNA integration reactions that were not mediated through conservative site-specific recombination or damaged the recombination sites but the extent of these aberrant reactions varied over at least an order of magnitude. Bxb1 integrase yielded approximately two-fold more recombinants and displayed about two fold less damage to the recombination sites than the next best recombinase; φC31 integrase.

conclusionsWe conclude that the Bxb1 and φC31 integrases are the reagents of choice for genome engineering in vertebrate cells and that DNA damage repair is a major limitation upon the utility of this class of site-specific recombinase.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsAttachment Sites, MicrobiologicalBacteriophagesCell Line, TumorCloning, MolecularDNADNA NucleotidyltransferasesEmbryonic Stem CellsEscherichia coliFibrosarcomaGene DeletionGenome, HumanHumansIntegrasesMiceDNADNA NucleotidyltransferasesIntegrasesRecombinasesSerineSite-specific recombinase

Identifiers

PMID24139482
PMCPMC4015280
OpenAlexW2130696033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.