Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24139203›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2013

Client-provider interactions in provider-initiated and voluntary HIV counseling and testing services in Uganda.

Rhoda K Wanyenze, David Kyaddondo, John Kinsman, Fredrick Makumbi, Robert Colebunders, Anita Hardon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A Framework for Health Communication Across the HIV Treatment Continuum.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2017
    Review
  4. Patient satisfaction with medical consultations among adults attending Mulago hospital assessment centre.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2016
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Rhoda K WanyenzeDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, Makerere University School of Public Health, P,O, Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda. rwanyenze@hotmail.com.
David Kyaddondo
John Kinsman
Fredrick Makumbi
Robert Colebunders
Anita Hardon
Makerere University · UGInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEUmeå University · SEUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Testing and Counseling for HIV: A Multi-Site StudyR01HD053268 · NICHD · WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION · PI OBERMEYER, CARLA M · 2006 to 2010
$2.2M
NICHD NIH HHS 5 R01 HD053268-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProvider-initiated HIV testing and counselling (PITC) is based on information-giving while voluntary counselling and testing (VCT) includes individualised client-centered counseling. It is not known if the provider-client experiences, perceptions and client satisfaction with the information provided differs in the two approaches.

methodsIn 2008, we conducted structured interviews with 627 individuals in Uganda; 301 tested through PITC and 326 through voluntary counselling and testing (VCT). We compared client experiences and perceptions based on the essential elements of consent, confidentiality, counseling, and referral for follow-up care. We conducted multivariate analysis for predictors of reporting information or counselling as sufficient.

resultsIn VCT, 96.6% (282) said they were asked for consent compared to 91.3% (198) in PITC (P = 0.01). About the information provided, 92.0% (286) in VCT found it sufficient compared to 78.7% (221) in PITC (P = <0.01). In VCT 79.9% (246) thought their results were kept confidential compared to 71.7% (200) in PITC (P = 0.02). Eighty percent (64) of HIV infected VCT clients said they were referred for follow-up care versus 87.3% (48) in PITC (p = 0.2). Predictors of perceived adequacy of information in PITC included an opportunity to ask questions (adj.RR 1.76, CI 1.41, 2.18) and expecting the test results received (adj.RR 1.18, CI 1.06, 1.33). For VCT significant factors included being given an opportunity to ask questions (adj.RR 1.62, CI 1.00, 2.60) and 3+ prior times tested, (adj.RR 1.05, CI 1.00, 1.09).

conclusionsThis study demonstrates good practices in the essential elements of HIV testing for both VCT and PITC. However, further quality enhancement is required in both testing approaches in relation to referral to HIV care post-test, client confidence in relation to confidentiality, and providing an opportunity to ask questions to address client-specific information needs.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsAdolescentAdultAIDS SerodiagnosisCommunicationConfidentialityCounselingFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInformed ConsentInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionReferral and Consultation

Identifiers

PMID24139203
PMCPMC3853209
OpenAlexW2172189742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.