ArticleBMC health services research2013
Acceptability and perceived barriers and facilitators to creating a national research register to enable 'direct to patient' enrolment into research: the Scottish Health Research Register (SHARE).
Article in BMC health services research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Measuring the willingness to share personal health information: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2023Pooled it
- A systematic literature review of researchers' and healthcare professionals' attitudes towards the secondary use and sharing of health administrative and clinical trial data.Systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- "Giving something back": A systematic review and ethical enquiry into public views on the use of patient data for research in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland.Wellcome open research · 2018Pooled it
- Consumer acceptability of a cancer registry-driven familial cancer testing pathway: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Unlocking insights: general practice staff perspectives on sharing general practice data for research - a scoping review.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Sharing health data for research purposes: results of a population survey in Germany.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Ethical and social implications of public-private partnerships in the context of genomic/big health data collection.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Article
- Talking Ethics Early in Health Data Public Private Partnerships.Journal of business ethics : JBE · 2024Article
- Views on sharing mental health data for research purposes: qualitative analysis of interviews with people with mental illness.BMC medical ethics · 2023Article
- An ethical code for collecting, using and transferring sensitive health data: outcomes of a modified Policy Delphi process in Singapore.BMC medical ethics · 2023Article
- Building public trust and confidence in secondary use of health data for healthcare improvement and research: a qualitative study pre-protocol.HRB open research · 2023Article
- Early experience with an opt-in research register - Scottish Health Research Register (SHARE): a multi-method evaluation of participant recruitment performance.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Article
- Religious Perspectives on Precision Medicine in Singapore.Asian bioethics review · 2021Article
- Exploring public concerns for sharing and governance of personal health information: a focus group study.JAMIA open · 2021Article
- An agenda-setting paper on data sharing platforms: euCanSHare workshop.Open research Europe · 2021Article
- Can a 'consent to contact' community help research teams overcome barriers to recruitment? The development and impact of the 'Research for the Future' community.BMC medical research methodology · 2019Article
- Big Data and Public-Private Partnerships in Healthcare and Research: The Application of an Ethics Framework for Big Data in Health and Research.Asian bioethics review · 2019Article
- A review of attitudes towards the reuse of health data among people in the European Union: The primacy of purpose and the common good.Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2019Review
- Facilitating access to health research through a participatory research register: a feasibility study in outpatient clinics.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2018Article
- Can learning health systems help organisations deliver personalised care?BMC medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDifficulties with recruitment pose a major, increasingly recognised challenge to the viability of research. We sought to explore whether a register of volunteers interested in research participation, with data linkage to electronic health records to identify suitable research participants, would prove acceptable to healthcare staff, patients and researchers.
methodsWe undertook a qualitative study in which a maximum variation sampling approach was adopted. Focus groups and interviews were conducted with patients, general practitioners (GP), practice managers and health service researchers in two Scottish health boards. Analysis was primarily thematic to identify a range of issues and concerns for all stakeholder groups.
resultsThe concept of a national research register was, in general, acceptable to all stakeholder groups and was widely regarded as beneficial for research and for society. Patients, however, highlighted a number of conditions which should be met in the design of a register to expedite confidence and facilitate recruitment. They also gave their perceptions on how a register should operate and be promoted, favouring a range of media. GPs and practice managers were primarily concerned with the security and confidentiality of patient data and the impact a register may have on their workload. Researchers were supportive of the initiative seeing advantages in more rapid access to a wider pool of patients. They did raise concerns that GPs may be able to block access to personal patient data held in general practice clinical systems and that the register may not be representative of the whole population.
conclusionsThis work suggests that patients, healthcare staff and researchers have a favourable view of the potential benefits of a national register to identify people who are potentially eligible and willing to participate in health related research. It has highlighted a number of issues for the developers to incorporate in the design of research registers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.