Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24139077›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2013

Quality of life and toxicity from passively scattered and spot-scanning proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer.

Thomas J Pugh, Mark F Munsell, Seungtaek Choi, Quyhn Nhu Nguyen, Benson Mathai, X Ron Zhu, Narayan Sahoo, Michael Gillin, Jennifer L Johnson, Richard A Amos and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03624660 (A Phase II Study of Dose-Escalated Proton-Based Radiation Therapy Delivered With a Simultaneous Integrated Boost), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03624660 phase2active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

A Phase II Study of Dose-Escalated Proton-Based Radiation Therapy Delivered With a Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) to Intraprostatic Tumors (IPT) Visible on Pretreatment Magnetic Resonance Image

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of FloridaRan2018 to 2029Enrolled100ConditionsAdenocarcinoma of the ProstateArmsHR-A, HR-B
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Proton therapy- the modality of choice for future radiation therapy management of Prostate Cancer?Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas J PughDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Mark F Munsell
Seungtaek Choi
Quyhn Nhu Nguyen
Benson Mathai
X Ron Zhu
Narayan Sahoo
Michael Gillin
Jennifer L Johnson
Richard A Amos
Lei Dong
Usama Mahmood
Deborah A Kuban
Steven J Frank
Karen E Hoffman
Sean E McGuire
Andrew K Lee
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USScripps Institution of Oceanography · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo report quality of life (QOL)/toxicity in men treated with proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer and to compare outcomes between passively scattered proton therapy (PSPT) and spot-scanning proton therapy (SSPT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Men with localized prostate cancer enrolled on a prospective QOL protocol with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up were reviewed. Comparative groups were defined by technique (PSPT vs SSPT). Patients completed Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaires at baseline and every 3-6 months after proton beam therapy. Clinically meaningful differences in QOL were defined as ≥0.5 × baseline standard deviation. The cumulative incidence of modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade ≥2 gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity and argon plasma coagulation were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method.

resultsA total of 226 men received PSPT, and 65 received SSPT. Both PSPT and SSPT resulted in statistically significant changes in sexual, urinary, and bowel Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite summary scores. Only bowel summary, function, and bother resulted in clinically meaningful decrements beyond treatment completion. The decrement in bowel QOL persisted through 24-month follow-up. Cumulative grade ≥2 GU and GI toxicity at 24 months were 13.4% and 9.6%, respectively. There was 1 grade 3 GI toxicity (PSPT group) and no other grade ≥3 GI or GU toxicity. Argon plasma coagulation application was infrequent (PSPT 4.4% vs SSPT 1.5%; P=.21). No statistically significant differences were appreciated between PSPT and SSPT regarding toxicity or QOL.

conclusionBoth PSPT and SSPT confer low rates of grade ≥2 GI or GU toxicity, with preservation of meaningful sexual and urinary QOL at 24 months. A modest, yet clinically meaningful, decrement in bowel QOL was seen throughout follow-up. No toxicity or QOL differences between PSPT and SSPT were identified. Long-term comparative results in a larger patient cohort are warranted.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeScattering, RadiationAgedAged, 80 and overHumansIntestinesMaleMiddle AgedOrgans at RiskProspective StudiesProstateProstatic NeoplasmsProton TherapySeminal VesiclesSexualityUrinary Bladder

Identifiers

PMID24139077
PMCPMC4086944
OpenAlexW2087943887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.