ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2013
Quality of life and toxicity from passively scattered and spot-scanning proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer.
Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03624660 (A Phase II Study of Dose-Escalated Proton-Based Radiation Therapy Delivered With a Simultaneous Integrated Boost), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase II Study of Dose-Escalated Proton-Based Radiation Therapy Delivered With a Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) to Intraprostatic Tumors (IPT) Visible on Pretreatment Magnetic Resonance Image
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute toxicity of image-guided hypofractionated proton therapy for localized prostate cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2018Trial
- Predictors of acute genitourinary toxicity in real-time image-gated spot-scanning proton beam therapy for prostate cancer.Journal of radiation research · 2026Article
- Five-Year Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Based Outcomes of Spot-Scanning Proton Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Single Institution Experience.Advances in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Potential Therapeutic Improvements in Prostate Cancer Treatment Using Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy with LETCancers · 2024Article
- Acute toxicity and patient-reported symptom score after conventional versus moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- Prostate Cancer Treatment with Pencil Beam Proton Therapy Using Rectal Spacers sans Endorectal Balloons.International journal of particle therapy · 2022Article
- Simulation study using the spots deletion technique in spot scanning proton beam therapy for prostate cancers.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2022Article
- Ultra-Hypofractionated Proton Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer: Passive Scattering versus Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Dose-volume histogram parameters and patient-reported EPIC-Bowel domain in prostate cancer proton therapy.Radiation oncology journal · 2021Article
- Health-related quality of life in Japanese patients with prostate cancer following proton beam therapy: an institutional cohort study.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2020Article
- Patient reported outcomes following proton pencil beam scanning vs. passive scatter/uniform scanning for localized prostate cancer: Secondary analysis of PCG 001-09.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2020Article
- Proton therapy- the modality of choice for future radiation therapy management of Prostate Cancer?Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2019Review
- Early toxicity and patient reported quality-of-life in patients receiving proton therapy for localized prostate cancer: a single institutional review of prospectively recorded outcomes.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2018Article
- Comparative Toxicities and Cost of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, Proton Radiation, and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Among Younger Men With Prostate Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2018Article
- Communicating Value in Health Care Using Radar Charts: A Case Study of Prostate Cancer.Journal of oncology practice · 2016Article
- Reducing the cost of proton radiation therapy: the feasibility of a streamlined treatment technique for prostate cancer.Cancers · 2015Article
- Article
- Towards Achieving the Full Clinical Potential of Proton Therapy by Inclusion of LET and RBE Models.Cancers · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo report quality of life (QOL)/toxicity in men treated with proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer and to compare outcomes between passively scattered proton therapy (PSPT) and spot-scanning proton therapy (SSPT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Men with localized prostate cancer enrolled on a prospective QOL protocol with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up were reviewed. Comparative groups were defined by technique (PSPT vs SSPT). Patients completed Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaires at baseline and every 3-6 months after proton beam therapy. Clinically meaningful differences in QOL were defined as ≥0.5 × baseline standard deviation. The cumulative incidence of modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade ≥2 gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity and argon plasma coagulation were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method.
resultsA total of 226 men received PSPT, and 65 received SSPT. Both PSPT and SSPT resulted in statistically significant changes in sexual, urinary, and bowel Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite summary scores. Only bowel summary, function, and bother resulted in clinically meaningful decrements beyond treatment completion. The decrement in bowel QOL persisted through 24-month follow-up. Cumulative grade ≥2 GU and GI toxicity at 24 months were 13.4% and 9.6%, respectively. There was 1 grade 3 GI toxicity (PSPT group) and no other grade ≥3 GI or GU toxicity. Argon plasma coagulation application was infrequent (PSPT 4.4% vs SSPT 1.5%; P=.21). No statistically significant differences were appreciated between PSPT and SSPT regarding toxicity or QOL.
conclusionBoth PSPT and SSPT confer low rates of grade ≥2 GI or GU toxicity, with preservation of meaningful sexual and urinary QOL at 24 months. A modest, yet clinically meaningful, decrement in bowel QOL was seen throughout follow-up. No toxicity or QOL differences between PSPT and SSPT were identified. Long-term comparative results in a larger patient cohort are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.