ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2013
The Drosophila anatomy ontology.
Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Cell Ontology in the age of single-cell omics.Scientific data · 2026Article
- A general strategy for generating expert-guided, simplified views of ontologies.Scientific data · 2026Article
- A general strategy for generating expert-guided, simplified views of ontologies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- DIGITtally-a new tool for streamlining and simplifying Drosophila melanogaster meta-analysis.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Pervasive tissue-, genetic background-, and allele-specific gene expression effects in Drosophila melanogaster.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- Uncertainty-aware single-cell annotation with a hierarchical reject option.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- The Gene Ontology knowledgebase in 2023.Genetics · 2023Review
- Review
- Virtual Fly Brain-An interactive atlas of theFrontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Review
- Contribution of model organism phenotypes to the computational identification of human disease genes.Disease models & mechanisms · 2022Article
- Article
- Fly Cell Atlas: A single-nucleus transcriptomic atlas of the adult fruit fly.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- Expression Atlas update: gene and protein expression in multiple species.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- A Programmable Ontology Encompassing the Functional Logic of theFrontiers in neuroinformatics · 2022Article
- Planarian Anatomy Ontology: a resource to connect data within and across experimental platforms.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2021Article
- Annotating the Insect Regulatory Genome.Insects · 2021Review
- The Bgee suite: integrated curated expression atlas and comparative transcriptomics in animals.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Article
- Finding semantic patterns in omics data using concept rule learning with an ontology-based refinement operator.BioData mining · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnatomy ontologies are query-able classifications of anatomical structures. They provide a widely-used means for standardising the annotation of phenotypes and expression in both human-readable and programmatically accessible forms. They are also frequently used to group annotations in biologically meaningful ways. Accurate annotation requires clear textual definitions for terms, ideally accompanied by images. Accurate grouping and fruitful programmatic usage requires high-quality formal definitions that can be used to automate classification and check for errors. The Drosophila anatomy ontology (DAO) consists of over 8000 classes with broad coverage of Drosophila anatomy. It has been used extensively for annotation by a range of resources, but until recently it was poorly formalised and had few textual definitions.
resultsWe have transformed the DAO into an ontology rich in formal and textual definitions in which the majority of classifications are automated and extensive error checking ensures quality. Here we present an overview of the content of the DAO, the patterns used in its formalisation, and the various uses it has been put to.
conclusionsAs a result of the work described here, the DAO provides a high-quality, queryable reference for the wild-type anatomy of Drosophila melanogaster and a set of terms to annotate data related to that anatomy. Extensive, well referenced textual definitions make it both a reliable and useful reference and ensure accurate use in annotation. Wide use of formal axioms allows a large proportion of classification to be automated and the use of consistency checking to eliminate errors. This increased formalisation has resulted in significant improvements to the completeness and accuracy of classification. The broad use of both formal and informal definitions make further development of the ontology sustainable and scalable. The patterns of formalisation used in the DAO are likely to be useful to developers of other anatomy ontologies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.