Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24138868›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2013

Sensitivity and robustness in covalent modification cycles with a bifunctional converter enzyme.

Ronny Straube

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ronny StraubeAnalysis and Redesign of Biological Networks Group, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, Magdeburg, Germany. Electronic address: rstraube@mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulation by covalent modification is a common mechanism to transmit signals in biological systems. The modifying reactions are catalyzed either by two distinct converter enzymes or by a single bifunctional enzyme (which may employ either one or two catalytic sites for its opposing activities). The reason for this diversification is unclear, but contemporary theoretical models predict that systems with distinct converter enzymes can exhibit enhanced sensitivity to input signals whereas bifunctional enzymes with two catalytic sites are believed to generate robustness against variations in system's components. However, experiments indicate that bifunctional enzymes can also exhibit enhanced sensitivity due to the zero-order effect, raising the question whether both phenomena could be understood within a common mechanistic model. Here, I argue that this is, indeed, the case. Specifically, I show that bifunctional enzymes with two catalytic sites can exhibit both ultrasensitivity and concentration robustness, depending on the kinetic operating regime of the enzyme's opposing activities. The model predictions are discussed in the context of experimental observations of ultrasensitivity and concentration robustness in the uridylylation cycle of the PII protein, and in the phosphorylation cycle of the isocitrate dehydrogenase, respectively.

Indexed as

BiocatalysisIsocitrate DehydrogenaseModels, BiologicalNucleotidyltransferasesPhosphoprotein PhosphatasesPhosphorylationProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesIsocitrate Dehydrogenaseisocitrate dehydrogenase kinaseisocitrate dehydrogenase phosphataseNucleotidyltransferasesPhosphoprotein PhosphatasesProtein Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID24138868
PMCPMC3797581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.