ArticleBiophysical journal2013
Physical origin of the contact frequency in chromosome conformation capture data.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetically regulated eRNA expression predicts chromatin contact frequency and reveals genetic mechanisms at GWAS loci.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Cohesin and CTCF complexes mediate contacts in chromatin loops depending on nucleosome positions.Biophysical journal · 2022Article
- Chromosome-wide co-fluctuation of stochastic gene expression in mammalian cells.PLoS genetics · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physical proximity between each pair of genomic loci in a nucleus is measured as a form of contact frequency in chromosome conformation capture-based methods. Complexity of chromosome structure in interphase can be characterized by measuring a statistical property of physical distance between genomic loci according to genomic separation along single chromatids. To find a relationship between the physical distance and the contact frequency, we propose a polymer model derived from the Langevin equation. The model is derived by considering a structure of a chromosome as a trajectory of a particle, where each consecutive segment in the chromosome corresponds to a transient position in the trajectory over time. Using chromosome conformation capture data, we demonstrate the functional relationship between the two quantities. The physical distances derived from the mean contact frequencies by the model show a good correlation with those from experimental data. From the model, we present that the mean contact frequency curve can be divided into three components that arise from different physical origins and show that the contact frequency is proportional to the contact surface area, not to the volume of segments suggested by the fractal globule model. The model explains both a decaying pattern of the contact frequency and the biphasic relationship between the physical distance and the genomic length.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.