ArticleHealth services research2013
Creating and supporting a mixed methods health services research team.
Article in Health services research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recruiting and Engaging Women of Reproductive Age with Obesity: Insights from A Mixed-Methods Study within A Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Trial
- Increasing the Value of Health Intervention Trials: Qualitative Research in the Early Psychosis Intervention Network (EPINET).Community mental health journal · 2025Article
- Using mixed methods for genetic counseling research.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Article
- Psychological distress and anxiety in Arab refugees and migrants during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany.Transcultural psychiatry · 2023Article
- Experiences of current vital signs monitoring practices and views of wearable monitoring: A qualitative study in patients and nurses.Journal of advanced nursing · 2022Article
- How We Review a Medical Education Research Manuscript.ATS scholar · 2022Article
- The Role of a Longitudinal, Multidisciplinary Clinic in Building a Unique Research Collaborative.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Designing Appropriate Mixed Methods Nursing Research.Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing · 2021Article
- Mixed methods grant applications in the health sciences: An analysis of reviewer comments.PloS one · 2019Article
- Participatory action research, mixed methods, and research teams: learning from philosophically juxtaposed methodologies for optimal research outcomes.BMC medical research methodology · 2018Article
- Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 7: supporting staff in evidence-based decision-making, implementation and evaluation in a local healthcare setting.BMC health services research · 2017Article
- Facilitative Components of Collaborative Learning: A Review of Nine Health Research Networks.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2017Review
- Health-Related Quality of Life Is Severely Affected in Primary Orthostatic Tremor.Frontiers in neurology · 2017Article
- New Evidence on the Green House Model of Nursing Home Care: Synthesis of Findings and Implications for Policy, Practice, and Research.Health services research · 2016Article
- Promoting an Alternative to Traditional Nursing Home Care: Evaluating the Green House Small Home Model. An Introduction from the Funders and the Green House Project.Health services research · 2016Article
- Integrating mixed methods in health services and delivery system research.Health services research · 2013Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo use the experience from a health services research evaluation to provide guidance in team development for mixed methods research.
methodsThe Research Initiative Valuing Eldercare (THRIVE) team was organized by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation to evaluate The Green House nursing home culture change program. This article describes the development of the research team and provides insights into how funders might engage with mixed methods research teams to maximize the value of the team.
resultsLike many mixed methods collaborations, the THRIVE team consisted of researchers from diverse disciplines, embracing diverse methodologies, and operating under a framework of nonhierarchical, shared leadership that required new collaborations, engagement, and commitment in the context of finite resources. Strategies to overcome these potential obstacles and achieve success included implementation of a Coordinating Center, dedicated time for planning and collaborating across researchers and methodologies, funded support for in-person meetings, and creative optimization of resources.
conclusionsChallenges are inevitably present in the formation and operation of effective mixed methods research teams. However, funders and research teams can implement strategies to promote success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.