Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24138608›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2013

Implementation of evidence-based employment services in specialty mental health.

Alison B Hamilton, Amy N Cohen, Dawn L Glover, Fiona Whelan, Eran Chemerinski, Kirk P McNagny, Deborah Mullins, Christopher Reist, Max Schubert, Alexander S Young

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00137280 (Implementing Effective, Collaborative Care for Schizophrenia), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00137280 nacompletednot on this map

Implementing Effective, Collaborative Care for Schizophrenia

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2007 to 2011Enrolled1,067ConditionsSchizophrenia, Chronic Illness, Weight Gain, Psychotic DisorderArmsCollaborative Chronic Illness Care Model
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Innovations in Mixed Methods Evaluations.Annual review of public health · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alison B HamiltonGreater Los Angeles VA Healthcare Center, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Amy N Cohen
Dawn L Glover
Fiona Whelan
Eran Chemerinski
Kirk P McNagny
Deborah Mullins
Christopher Reist
Max Schubert
Alexander S Young

Funding

The Role of Social Networks in Treatment Engagement for MinoritiesP30MH082760 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WELLS, KENNETH B. · 2008 to 2012
$8.6M
IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES IRI-MHSR25MH080916 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Byron James Powell · 2009 to 2026
$3.7M
HSRD VA MNT 03-213NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH082760NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH080916NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH080916-01A2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveStudy a quality improvement approach for implementing evidence-based employment services at specialty mental health clinics. DATA SOURCES/STUDY

settingSemistructured interviews with clinicians and administrators before, during, and after implementation. Qualitative field notes, structured baseline and follow-up interviews with patients, semistructured interviews with patients after implementation, and administrative data. STUDY

designSite-level controlled trial at four implementation and four control sites. Hybrid implementation-effectiveness study with mixed methods intervention evaluation design. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodsSite visits, in-person and telephone interviews, patient surveys, patient self-assessment. A total of 801 patients completed baseline surveys and 53 clinicians and other clinical key stakeholders completed longitudinal qualitative interviews. PRINCIPAL

findingsAt baseline, sites varied in the availability, utilization, and quality of supported employment. Each site needed quality improvement for this service, though for differing reasons, with some needing development of the service itself and others needing increased service capacity. Improvements in knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and referral behaviors were evident in mid- and postimplementation interviews, though some barriers persisted. Half of patients expressed an interest in working at baseline. Patients at implementation sites were 2.3 times more likely to receive employment services during the study year. Those who had a service visit were more likely to be employed at follow-up than those who did not.

conclusionsStudies of implementation and effectiveness require mixed methods to both enhance implementation in real time and provide context for interpretation of complex results. In this study, a quality improvement approach resulted in superior patient-level outcomes and improved clinician knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors, in the context of substantial variation among sites.

Indexed as

AdultEmploymentEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHealth Services ResearchHumansInservice TrainingInterviews as TopicMaleMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedProgram DevelopmentQuality ImprovementSchizophreniaSelf-AssessmentSocial Marketinghealth servicesimplementation researchMixed methodsschizophreniasupported employment

Identifiers

PMID24138608
PMCPMC4097836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.