Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24138537›Full record

Trial reportAIDS patient care and STDs2013

A randomized controlled trial to assess safety, tolerability, and antepartum viral load with increased lopinavir/ritonavir dosage in pregnancy.

Simone Martins Bonafe, Durval A Gomes Costa, Maria J Rodrigues Vaz, Jorge Figueiredo Senise, Henrique Pott-Junior, Rachel H Vieira Machado, Adauto Castelo

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS patient care and STDs, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Pharmacokinetics of Once Versus Twice Daily Darunavir in Pregnant HIV-Infected Women.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Simone Martins BonafeReference Center for HIV-Infected Pregnant Women - NUPAIG, Division of Infectious Diseases, Universidade Federal de São Paulo , São Paulo, Brazil .
Durval A Gomes Costa
Maria J Rodrigues Vaz
Jorge Figueiredo Senise
Henrique Pott-Junior
Rachel H Vieira Machado
Adauto Castelo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HIV mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) is significantly reduced if antepartum viral load (apVL) is<50 copies/mL. Pharmacokinetic studies suggest increasing the dosage of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in pregnancy. It is important to assess tolerance, safety, and rate of patients presenting a apVL<50 copies/mL when treating with increased dose of LPV/r during pregnancy. Confirmed HIV-infected pregnant women with a fetus at a gestational age of 14-33 weeks were randomly assigned to receive LPV/r 400/100 or 600/150 mg b.i.d. plus two nucleoside analogues (NRTIs). Treatment was discontinued in the case of alanine transaminase (ALT) of grade III elevation or higher, glucose, or triglycerides. Thirty-two women were randomized to the LPV/r 400/100 mg dose, and 31 women were randomized to the 600/150 mg dose. Overall, 9.4% of the women receiving the conventional dose, and 17.2% receiving the increased dose, discontinued treatment because of adverse events (p=0.29). The rates of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, laboratory abnormalities, preterm delivery, and low birth weight were similar in both groups. There were no cases of HIV MTCT. Among the women with a baseline VL>50 copies/mL assigned to the conventional dose group, 45% (95% confidence interval [CI] 62.5-27.5%) had a apVL>50 copies/mL compared with 10.5% (95% CI 21.6-0.6%) of those assigned to the increased dose group (p=0.01). There was no significant difference found for the patients with a baseline VL<50 copies/mL. In pregnant women with a baseline VL>50 copies/mL, it may be warranted to initiate LPV/r dosing at 600/150 mg, whereas the conventional dose is sufficient for pregnant women with a baseline VL<50 copies/mL.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-HIV AgentsCD4 Lymphocyte CountDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalLopinavirPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPregnancy TrimestersPrenatal CareProtease InhibitorsAnti-HIV AgentsLopinavirProtease InhibitorsRitonavirRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID24138537
PMCPMC3820124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.