Reply to JL Leroy et al.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Prediction of stunting and its socioeconomic determinants among adolescent girls in Ethiopia using machine learning algorithms.PloS one · 2025
   Article
2. Adolescent Girls' Nutritional Status and Knowledge, Beliefs, Practices, and Access to Services: An Assessment to Guide Intervention Design in Nepal.Current developments in nutrition · 2020
   Article
3. Stunting and Its Associated Factors among Early Adolescent School Girls of Gondar Town, Northwest Ethiopia: A School-Based Cross-Sectional Study.BioMed research international · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Critical windows for nutritional interventions against stunting.2013
• Comment on
  Critical windows for nutritional interventions against stunting.2013

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as