Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24137497›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2013

Effectiveness of HIV risk reduction interventions among men who have sex with men in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hongyan Lu, Yu Liu, Kapil Dahiya, Han-Zhu Qian, Wensheng Fan, Li Zhang, Juntao Ma, Yuhua Ruan, Yiming Shao, Sten H Vermund and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hongyan LuInstitute for AIDS/STD Prevention & Control, Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China.
Yu Liu
Kapil Dahiya
Han-Zhu Qian
Wensheng Fan
Li Zhang
Juntao Ma
Yuhua Ruan
Yiming Shao
Sten H Vermund
Lu Yin

Funding

Multi-component HIV Intervention Packages for Chinese MSMR01AI094562 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI QIAN, HAN-ZHU, VERMUND, STEN H. · 2011 to 2014
$2.5M
Expanded Testing, Linkage, and Treatment for HIV Prevention Among MSM in ChinaR34AI091446 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI VERMUND, STEN H. · 2011 to 2011
$226k
FUNCTION OF AND SIGNALING BY THE B CELL PROTEINF32AI009462 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PAN, CHIN · 1996 to 1996
–
NIAID NIH HHS F32 AI009462NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI094562NIAID NIH HHS R01AI09462NIAID NIH HHS R34 AI091446NIAID NIH HHS R34AI091446
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effect of risk reduction interventions on HIV knowledge, attitudes and behaviors among men who have sex with men (MSM) in China.

methodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of HIV risk reduction intervention studies among Chinese MSM. The summary difference of standardized mean differences (SMD) between both study arms or between pre- and post-intervention assessments were defined as the effect size (ES); ES was calculated using standard meta-analysis in random effects models.

resultsThirty-four eligible studies were included in the analysis, including two randomized clinical trials (RCT), six quasi-experimental studies, six pre-and-post intervention studies, and twenty serial cross-sectional intervention studies. These studies showed an increase in consistent condom use with any male sexual partners (mean ES, 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.56), with regular sexual partners (mean ES, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.18-0.63), and casual sexual partners (mean ES, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.24-0.79). The analysis of ten studies that measured the impact on uptake of HIV testing also showed a positive result (mean ES, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.38-0.71). The risk reduction interventions also improved HIV/AIDS-related knowledge (mean ES, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60-0.94) and attitudes (mean ES, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.91-1.79), but did not reduce prevalence of HIV (mean ES, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.02-0.45) and syphilis infections (mean ES, -0.01; 95% CI, -0.19-0.17). There was significant heterogeneity among these studies.

conclusionsOn aggregate, HIV risk reduction interventions were effective in reducing risky behaviors and improving knowledge and attitudes among Chinese MSM, but were not associated with a change in the prevalence of HIV and syphilis. Future studies should use incidence as definitive study outcome.

Indexed as

Risk Reduction BehaviorChinaHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleSafe SexSyphilis

Identifiers

PMID24137497
PMCPMC3796948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.