ArticleJournal of sports science & medicine2012
Kinematic changes during a marathon for fast and slow runners.
Article in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Biomechanical Response of the Lower Extremity to Running-Induced Acute Fatigue: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Pooled it
- Response to fatigue protocol on running ground reaction forces in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and pronated feet: a cross-sectional observational study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Observational
- Article
- Effects of running distance on per-step and cumulative lower-extremity loading during a simulated treadmill half marathon.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The effects of different carbon-fiber plate shapes in shoes on lower limb biomechanics following running-induced fatigue.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Subject-specific sensitivity of several biomechanical features to fatigue during an exhaustive treadmill run.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Influence of Fatigue on the Modification of Biomechanical Parameters in Endurance Running: A Systematic Review.International journal of exercise science · 2024Review
- Predicting vertical ground reaction force characteristics during running with machine learning.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- The Validity of a Three-Dimensional Motion Capture System and the Garmin Running Dynamics Pod in Connection with an Assessment of Ground Contact Time While Running in Place.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Impact of marathon performance on muscles stiffness in runners over 50 years old.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Use of subject-specific models to detect fatigue-related changes in running biomechanics: a random forest approach.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023Article
- Quantifying and correcting for speed and stride frequency effects on running mechanics in fatiguing outdoor running.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023Article
- Changes in segment coordination variability and the impacts of the lower limb across running mileages in half marathons: Implications for running injuries.Journal of sport and health science · 2022Article
- Effects of compression running pants and treadmill running stages on knee proprioception and fatigue-related physiological responses in half-marathon runners.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Relationship between early-onset muscle soreness and indirect muscle damage markers and their dynamics after a full marathon.Journal of exercise science and fitness · 2020Article
- Men's and Women's World Championship Marathon Performances and Changes With Fatigue Are Not Explained by Kinematic Differences Between Footstrike Patterns.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2020Article
- High tibial osteotomy solely for the purpose of return to lifelong sporting activities among elderly patients: A case series study.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2020Article
- Effect of custom-made and prefabricated foot orthoses on kinematic parameters during an intense prolonged run.PloS one · 2020Article
- Kinematic alterations after two high-intensity intermittent training protocols in endurance runners.Journal of sport and health science · 2019Article
- Foot Pronation Contributes to Altered Lower Extremity Loading After Long Distance Running.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledThe purpose of this study was to describe kinematic changes that occur during an actual marathon. We hypothesized that (1) certain running kinematic measures would change between kilometres 8 and 40 (miles 5 and 25) of a marathon and (2) fast runners would demonstrate smaller changes than slow runners. Subjects (n = 179) were selected according to finish time (Range = 2:20:47 to 5:30:10). Two high-speed cameras were used to measure sagittal-plane kinematics at kilometres 8 and 40 of the marathon. The dependent variables were stride length, contact time, peak knee flexion during support and swing, and peak hip flexion and extension during swing. Two-tailed paired t-tests were used to compare dependent variables between kilometres 8 and 40 for all subjects, and regression analyses were used to determine whether faster runners exhibited smaller changes (between miles 5 and 25) than slower runners. For all runners, every dependent variable changed significantly between kilometres 8 and 40 (p < 0.001). Stride length increased 1.3%, contact time increased 13.1%, peak knee flexion during support decreased 3.2%, and peak hip extension, knee flexion, and hip flexion during swing decreased 27.9%, increased 4.3%, and increased 7.4%, respectively (p < 0.001). Among these significant changes, all runners generally changed the same from kilometres 8 and 40 except that fast runners decreased peak knee flexion during support less than the slow runners (p < 0.002). We believe that these changes, for all runners (fast and slow), were due to fatigue. The fact that fast runners maintained knee flexion during support more consistently might be due to their condition on the race day. Strengthening of knee extensor muscles may facilitate increased knee flexion during support throughout a marathon. KEY POINTS: Runners changed kinematics significantly from kilometres 8 to 40 (increased stride length, contact time, peak hip flexion during swing, and peak knee flexion during swing, and decreased running speed, stride frequency, peak knee flexion during support and peak hip extension during swing).Fast runners demonstrated more peak knee flexion during support throughout a marathon.Runners generally changed kinematics similarly (between kilometres 8 and 40) except that fast runners exhibited a more consistent peak knee flexion during support than slow runners.Resistance training that would increase both muscular strength and endurance of knee extensors may increase peak knee flexion during support and help maintain it similar to the fast runners throughout a marathon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24137065PMC3737836What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.