Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24136634›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2013

Effectiveness of telemonitoring integrated into existing clinical services on hospital admission for exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: researcher blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Hilary Pinnock, Janet Hanley, Lucy McCloughan, Allison Todd, Ashma Krishan, Stephanie Lewis, Andrew Stoddart, Marjon van der Pol, William MacNee, Aziz Sheikh and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 145 papers, 22 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
145citing papers in PubMed, 22 pooled it
24.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02528370 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation the Effectiveness of a Telemonitoring Program in a Cohort of COPD Patient With Frequent Readmissions

TypeinterventionalSponsorDr. Cristobal EstebanRan2010 to 2013Enrolled197ConditionsCOPDArmstelEPOC
NCT04978922 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Impact of the Artificial Intelligence (Machine Learning) in a Telemonitoring Programme of COPD Patients With Multiple Hospitalizations (telEPOC)

TypeinterventionalSponsorDr. Cristobal EstebanRan2018 to 2022Enrolled345ConditionsCOPDArmsMachine Learning: ML (Artificial Intelligence System)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

145 citing papers in PubMed, 22 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 313 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Telemonitoring Interventions on Severe COPD Exacerbations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  13. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients' Acceptance in E-Health Clinical Trials.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

85 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Hilary PinnockAllergy and Respiratory Research Group, Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK.
Janet Hanley
Lucy McCloughan
Allison Todd
Ashma Krishan
Stephanie Lewis
Andrew Stoddart
Marjon van der Pol
William MacNee
Aziz Sheikh
Claudia Pagliari
Brian McKinstry
Glasgow Centre for Population Health · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBCentre for Inflammation Research · GBEdinburgh Napier University · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office ARPG/07/03Chief Scientist Office PCRCA/08/01Medical Research Council G0800803Medical Research Council G0901697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo test the effectiveness of telemonitoring integrated into existing clinical services such that intervention and control groups have access to the same clinical care.

designResearcher blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

settingUK primary care (Lothian, Scotland).

participantsAdults with at least one admission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the year before randomisation. We excluded people who had other significant lung disease, who were unable to provide informed consent or complete the study, or who had other significant social or clinical problems.

interventionsParticipants were recruited between 21 May 2009 and 28 March 2011, and centrally randomised to receive telemonitoring or conventional self monitoring. Using a touch screen, telemonitoring participants recorded a daily questionnaire about symptoms and treatment use, and monitored oxygen saturation using linked instruments. Algorithms, based on the symptom score, generated alerts if readings were omitted or breached thresholds. Both groups received similar care from existing clinical services.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was time to hospital admission due to COPD exacerbation up to one year after randomisation. Other outcomes included number and duration of admissions, and validated questionnaire assessments of health related quality of life (using St George's respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ)), anxiety or depression (or both), self efficacy, knowledge, and adherence to treatment. Analysis was intention to treat.

resultsOf 256 patients completing the study, 128 patients were randomised to telemonitoring and 128 to usual care; baseline characteristics of each group were similar. The number of days to admission did not differ significantly between groups (adjusted hazard ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 1.44). Over one year, the mean number of COPD admissions was similar in both groups (telemonitoring 1.2 admissions per person (standard deviation 1.9) v control 1.1 (1.6); P=0.59). Mean duration of COPD admissions over one year was also similar between groups (9.5 days per person (standard deviation 19.1) v 8.8 days (15.9); P=0.88). The intervention had no significant effect on SGRQ scores between groups (68.2 (standard deviation 16.3) v 67.3 (17.3); adjusted mean difference 1.39 (95% confidence interval -1.57 to 4.35)), or on other questionnaire outcomes. Conclusions In participants with a history of admission for exacerbations of COPD, telemonitoring was not effective in postponing admissions and did not improve quality of life. The positive effect of telemonitoring seen in previous trials could be due to enhancement of the underpinning clinical service rather than the telemonitoring communication.

trial registrationISRCTN96634935.

fundingThe trial was funded by an NHS applied research programme grant from the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish government (ARPG/07/03). The funder had no role in study design and the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and the writing of the article and the decision to submit it for publication. NHS Lothian supported the telemonitoring service and the clinical services.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionPrimary Health CareQuality of LifeTelemedicineAgedAlgorithmsDecision Support Systems, ClinicalFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHospitalizationHumansMaleMedication AdherencePatient ReadmissionProgram EvaluationPulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Identifiers

PMID24136634
PMCPMC3805483
OpenAlexW2142485883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.