Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24136090›Full record

ReviewDrugs2013

Fidaxomicin: a review of its use in patients with Clostridium difficile infection.

Lesley J Scott

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Fidaxomicin for the treatment ofFuture microbiology · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Bacterial Transcription as a Target for Antibacterial Drug Development.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2016
    Review
  5. Clinical conundrums in management of sepsis in the elderly.Journal of translational internal medicine
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lesley J ScottAdis, 41 Centorian Drive, Private Bag 65901, Mairangi Bay, North Shore, 0754, Auckland, New Zealand, demail@springer.com.
North Shore Hospital · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral fidaxomicin (Dificid(®); Dificlir(®)) is a first-in-class macrocyclic antibacterial that is approved in several countries for the treatment of adult patients with Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea. Fidaxomicin 200 mg twice daily for 10 days was an effective and generally well tolerated treatment in adult patients with a first episode or first recurrence of C. difficile infection. In two multinational phase III trials, fidaxomicin treatment was noninferior to vancomycin treatment with regard to clinical cure rates and was associated with statistically significantly lower C. difficile infection recurrence rates and statistically significantly higher global cure rates than vancomycin. The drug has a favourable pharmacological profile, including having a narrow spectrum of activity that targets relevant pathogens, minimal impact on normal faecal microflora, a convenient treatment regimen and attainment of very high faecal concentrations. Albeit further clinical experience is required to fully define the position of fidaxomicin, it is a valuable emerging option for the treatment of first episode and recurrent episodes of C. difficile-associated diarrhoea.

Indexed as

AminoglycosidesAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicClostridioides difficileDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEnterocolitis, PseudomembranousFidaxomicinHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsTreatment OutcomeAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsFidaxomicin

Identifiers

PMID24136090
OpenAlexW2054395318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.