ReviewInternal and emergency medicine2013
Combination of a new oral anticoagulant, aspirin and clopidogrel after acute coronary syndrome: new therapeutic standard?
Review in Internal and emergency medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- VE-1902-A direct thrombin inhibitor with reversible covalent mechanism of action shows efficacy with reduced bleeding in rodent models of thrombosis.Thrombosis research · 2020Article
- Direct oral anticoagulant and antiplatelet combination therapy: Hemorrhagic events in coronary artery stent recipients.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2018Article
- Use of rivaroxaban in patients with stroke.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2017Review
- Pharmacology: Dual therapy guidance.British dental journal · 2016Article
- Direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: can data from randomized clinical trials be safely transferred to the general population? No.Internal and emergency medicine · 2015Article
- Direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: can data from randomized clinical trials be safely transferred to the general population? Yes.Internal and emergency medicine · 2015Article
- Direct oral anticoagulants in the secondary prevention of stroke and transient ischemic attack in patients with atrial fibrillation.Internal and emergency medicine · 2015Review
- The criteria of the Italian Federation of Thrombosis Centres on DOACs: a "real world" application in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients already on vitamin K antagonist.Internal and emergency medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective secondary prevention after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is largely dependent on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Despite DAPT, however, patients remain at substantial risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (i.e., cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke), and, therefore, combination therapy of oral anticoagulant and antiplatelets has been previously proposed. Because of the increase in bleeding and the cumbersome management of vitamin K antagonists, such combination therapy has never gained much popularity. The recent development of new, non vitamin K antagonists, direct oral anticoagulants (NOACs), including dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and darexaban, which have more favorable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, as well as higher safety, has renewed the interest on combination therapy. Whereas phase II trials with dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and darexaban have consistently shown an increased bleeding risk with combination therapy, a potential increased efficacy has emerged for apixaban and rivaroxaban, thereby prompting phase III studies. Both APPRAISE-2 and ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI 51 trials confirm a dose-dependent increase in major bleeding events, including intracranial, with apixaban and rivaroxaban when combined with DAPT. Low-dose (2.5 mg twice daily) rivaroxaban on the other hand, is associated with a significantly higher efficacy on the occurrence of combined cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and of stent thrombosis. Owing to the persistent uncertainty regarding the net clinical benefit of combined therapy of NOAC, namely low-dose (2.5 mg twice daily) rivaroxaban and DAPT of aspirin and clopidogrel, further studies are warranted to identify the ACS patient who will benefit most from such treatment, also in comparison to the current therapeutic standard represented by DAPT of aspirin and ticagrelor (or prasugrel).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.