Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24136072›Full record

ReviewInternal and emergency medicine2013

Combination of a new oral anticoagulant, aspirin and clopidogrel after acute coronary syndrome: new therapeutic standard?

Andrea Rubboli, Jonas Oldgren, Francisco Marìn, Gregory Lip

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Internal and emergency medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Direct oral anticoagulant and antiplatelet combination therapy: Hemorrhagic events in coronary artery stent recipients.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2018
    Article
  3. Use of rivaroxaban in patients with stroke.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2017
    Review
  4. Pharmacology: Dual therapy guidance.British dental journal · 2016
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrea RubboliDivision of Cardiology, Laboratory of Interventional Cardiology, Ospedale Maggiore, 40133, Bologna, Italy, andrearubboli@libero.it.
Jonas Oldgren
Francisco Marìn
Gregory Lip
Birmingham City Hospital · GBHospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca · ESUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective secondary prevention after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is largely dependent on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Despite DAPT, however, patients remain at substantial risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (i.e., cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke), and, therefore, combination therapy of oral anticoagulant and antiplatelets has been previously proposed. Because of the increase in bleeding and the cumbersome management of vitamin K antagonists, such combination therapy has never gained much popularity. The recent development of new, non vitamin K antagonists, direct oral anticoagulants (NOACs), including dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and darexaban, which have more favorable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, as well as higher safety, has renewed the interest on combination therapy. Whereas phase II trials with dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and darexaban have consistently shown an increased bleeding risk with combination therapy, a potential increased efficacy has emerged for apixaban and rivaroxaban, thereby prompting phase III studies. Both APPRAISE-2 and ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI 51 trials confirm a dose-dependent increase in major bleeding events, including intracranial, with apixaban and rivaroxaban when combined with DAPT. Low-dose (2.5 mg twice daily) rivaroxaban on the other hand, is associated with a significantly higher efficacy on the occurrence of combined cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and of stent thrombosis. Owing to the persistent uncertainty regarding the net clinical benefit of combined therapy of NOAC, namely low-dose (2.5 mg twice daily) rivaroxaban and DAPT of aspirin and clopidogrel, further studies are warranted to identify the ACS patient who will benefit most from such treatment, also in comparison to the current therapeutic standard represented by DAPT of aspirin and ticagrelor (or prasugrel).

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAdministration, OralAnticoagulantsAspirinCardiovascular DiseasesClinical Trials as TopicClopidogrelDrug CombinationsHumansPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsSecondary PreventionTiclopidineAnticoagulantsAspirinClopidogrelDrug CombinationsPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsTiclopidine

Identifiers

PMID24136072
OpenAlexW2029903013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.