ReviewHuman genetics2014
Genomics meets proteomics: identifying the culprits in disease.
Review in Human genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mathematical Model to Assess Mutational Burden in Retinal Dystrophy Patients Negative to Mendelian Genetic Tests and Carriers of Multiple Recessive Variants.Journal of ophthalmic & vision research · 2026Article
- Mendelian randomization identifies proteins involved in neurodegenerative diseases.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Precision Oncology Beyond Genomics: The Future Is Here-It Is Just Not Evenly Distributed.Cells · 2021Review
- Genetic predisposition to necrotizing enterocolitis in premature infants: Current knowledge, challenges, and future directions.Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine · 2018Review
- Connecting genetic risk to disease end points through the human blood plasma proteome.Nature communications · 2017Article
- HASE: Framework for efficient high-dimensional association analyses.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Pediatric asthma and autism-genomic perspectives.Clinical and translational medicine · 2015Article
- An assessment of genetic counseling services for individuals with multiple sclerosis.Journal of genetic counseling · 2015Article
- Proteogenomic analysis of psoriasis reveals discordant and concordant changes in mRNA and protein abundance.Genome medicine · 2015Article
- Proteogenomics: concepts, applications and computational strategies.Nature methods · 2014Review
- Relationship between genome and epigenome--challenges and requirements for future research.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Recent advances in molecular imaging of premalignant gastrointestinal lesions and future application for early detection of barrett esophagus.Clinical endoscopy · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) revealed genomic risk loci that potentially have an impact on disease and phenotypic traits. This extensive resource holds great promise in providing novel directions for personalized medicine, including disease risk prediction, prevention and targeted medication. One of the major challenges that researchers face on the path between the initial identification of an association and precision treatment of patients is the comprehension of the biological mechanisms that underlie these associations. Currently, the focus to solve these questions lies on the integrative analysis of system-wide data on global genome variation, gene expression, transcription factor binding, epigenetic profiles and chromatin conformation. The generation of this data mainly relies on next-generation sequencing. However, due to multiple recent developments, mass spectrometry-based proteomics now offers additional, by the GWAS field so far hardly recognized possibilities for the identification of functional genome variants and, in particular, for the identification and characterization of (differentially) bound protein complexes as well as physiological target genes. In this review, we introduce these proteomics advances and suggest how they might be integrated in post-GWAS workflows. We argue that the combination of highly complementary techniques is powerful and can provide an unbiased, detailed picture of GWAS loci and their mechanistic involvement in disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.