Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24135696›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2013

Modelling and analysis of local field potentials for studying the function of cortical circuits.

Gaute T Einevoll, Christoph Kayser, Nikos K Logothetis, Stefano Panzeri

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 426 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
426citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

426 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Spectral dependence as a framework for neural coordination.Current research in neurobiology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Sometimes extracellular recordings fail for good reasons.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026
    Article
  19. A Framework for Compressive On-Chip Action Potential Recording.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

366 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gaute T EinevollDepartment of Mathematical Sciences and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1432 Ås, Norway.
Christoph Kayser
Nikos K Logothetis
Stefano Panzeri

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past decade has witnessed a renewed interest in cortical local field potentials (LFPs)--that is, extracellularly recorded potentials with frequencies of up to ~500 Hz. This is due to both the advent of multielectrodes, which has enabled recording of LFPs at tens to hundreds of sites simultaneously, and the insight that LFPs offer a unique window into key integrative synaptic processes in cortical populations. However, owing to its numerous potential neural sources, the LFP is more difficult to interpret than are spikes. Careful mathematical modelling and analysis are needed to take full advantage of the opportunities that this signal offers in understanding signal processing in cortical circuits and, ultimately, the neural basis of perception and cognition.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsAlgorithmsAnimalsCerebral CortexElectroencephalographyElectrophysiological PhenomenaEvoked PotentialsHumansNerve NetNeural PathwaysNeuronsSynapses

Identifiers

PMID24135696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.